Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

MIAMI NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT: PRESUMPTION OF IRREPARABLE HARM
Mavrick Law Firm

Courts can enforce the breach of a restrictive covenant like a non-compete agreement by enjoining the defendant from taking additional actions that violate the non-compete agreement. Fla. Stat. § 542.335 (“A court shall enforce a restrictive covenant by any appropriate and effective remedy, including, but not limited to, temporary and permanent injunctions.”). Courts can likewise…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT: INJUNCTION BOND AMOUNT
Mavrick Law Firm

Temporary and permanent injunctions are often a part of restrictive covenant lawsuits and trade secret lawsuits. In facts, Florida’s restrictive covenant statute expressly contemplates enforcement of a restrictive covenant through an injunction and creates a presumption in favor of granting an injunction when a restrictive covenant is breached. Fla. Stat. § 542.335 (“A court shall…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT: FTC ALLOWS NONCOMPETITION AGREEMENTS
Mavrick Law Firm

In September 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) formally withdrew its appeal in the pivotal case titled Ryan LLC v. FTC and Properties of the Villages v. FTC, which struck down the FTC’s 2024 attempt to generally ban non-compete agreements and similar restrictive covenants across the board. In Ryan, you may recall that the United…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADE SECRET IRREPARABLE HARM
Mavrick Law Firm

The injunction remedy is an important facet of a trade secret lawsuit because it precludes the misappropriator from using the trade secret. Courts can grant an injunction to prevent actual or threatened misappropriation or require affirmative actions to protect the trade secret. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1836. To obtain an injunction, the movant must establish, among…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: IMPLIED-IN-FACT CONTRACTS
Mavrick Law Firm

Contracts are usually expressed through writings or oral statements. But sometimes, contracts are implied through certain circumstances. These implied-in-fact contracts are recognized under Florida law. Bromer v. Florida Power & Light Co., 45 So.2d 658 (Fla. 1949) (“This Court should determine and give to the alleged implied contract the effect which the parties, as fair…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: UNILATERAL MISTAKE
Mavrick Law Firm

The existence of a unilateral mistake contract defense was confirmed by the Florida Supreme Court in Maryland Cas. Co. v. Krasnek, 174 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 1965). The Florida Supreme Court stated, “[a]lthough there is little doubt that the statement in the District Court’s opinion that unilateral mistake provides no basis for rescission of a…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: PREDISPOSITION TO ENDING A BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP
Mavrick Law Firm

Lawsuits to prevent unlawful competition can take several forms. A lawsuit may involve the enforcement of a restrictive covenant like non-compete agreements, non-solicitation provisions, or non-disclosure agreements. These agreements are only permitted when supported by a legitimate business interest demonstrating the restrictive covenant provision is intended to prevent unlawful competition. White v. Mederi Caretenders Visiting…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: ACCOUNT STATED AND OPEN ACCOUNT
Mavrick Law Firm

Business litigants owed money by another usually sue for breach of contract. However, there are other common law claims that can be asserted along with, or instead of, breach of contract to recover a debt owed by another. One potential claim is called an account stated and other potential claim is called open account. The…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: NOMINAL PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT
Mavrick Law Firm

Attorney’s fees are only recoverable when authorized by statute of by agreement of the parties. Reiterer v. Monteil, 98 So. 3d 586 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (“[A]ttorney’s fees may be awarded by a court only when authorized by statute or by agreement of the parties.”). This can make recovering attorney’s fees challenging when there is…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT: INJUNCTION DISSOLUTION
Mavrick Law Firm

Plaintiffs in trade secrets lawsuits and non-compete lawsuits often seek and obtain injunctions preventing defendants from misappropriating the trade secrets or unlawfully competing. Florida’s trade secret statute expressly allows for injunction relief. Fla. Stat. § 688.003 (“Actual or threatened misappropriation may be enjoined.”). Florida’s restrictive covenant statute likewise allows for injunctive relief. Fla. Stat. §…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message