Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: FRAUD BY OMISSION
Mavrick Law Firm

 While fraud typically includes a fraudulent misrepresentation, under certain circumstances, omission of facts can also constitute fraud. In Florida, the elements of a claim of fraud are “(1) a false statement concerning a specific material fact; (2) the maker’s knowledge that the representation is false; (3) an intention that the representation induces another’s reliance; and…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: PRIVILEGED FEE RECORDS
Mavrick Law Firm

A litigant cannot generally obtain its adversary’s attorney’s fee records pre-trial because those records are privileged. Tumelaire v. Naples Ests. Homeowners Ass’n, Inc., 137 So. 3d 596 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (“As to the information on the fee arrangement between Tumelaire and her attorney, this information is indeed protected by attorney-client privilege.”). Courts have determined…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATION VS. NEGLIGENT REPRESENATION
Mavrick Law Firm

Fraudulent misrepresentation and negligent misrepresentation are similar claims. Both involve the expression of a false statement. However, there are differences between the two, and those differences can alter the outcome of a business dispute if they are not considered carefully. The Miami business litigation attorneys of the Mavrick Law Firm represent businesses and their owners…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: RECOVERING COSTS
Mavrick Law Firm

The prevailing party in a lawsuit can recover the taxable costs it spent litigating. Fla. Stat. § 57.041 (“The party recovering judgment shall recover all his or her legal costs and charges which shall be included in the judgment.”). Taxable costs are recoverable even if there is no statute or contract provision allowing for recovery.…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: UNFAIR COMPETITION
Mavrick Law Firm

There are many claims a plaintiff can bring to thwart unfair competition or recover damages from unfair competition. Plaintiffs can assert trade secret misappropriation claims, trade mark infringement claims, tortious interference claims, breach of restrictive covenant claims, breach of fiduciary duty of loyalty claims, and deceptive and unfair trade practices claims among others. However, the…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: FLORIDA CIRCUIT COURT JURISDICTION
Mavrick Law Firm

The court presiding over any matter must have jurisdiction over the subject matter because it provides the court with “the power [to] lawfully… hear and determine a cause.” Cunningham v. Standard Guaranty Insurance Co., 630 So.2d 179 (Fla. 1994). “It is the power to lawfully conferred to deal with the general subject involved in the…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: GENERAL AND SPECIFIC VERDICT FORMS
Mavrick Law Firm

The type of the verdict form used at trial is usually not given great consideration at the outset of the lawsuit. However, the form of the verdict form has the potential to play a key role in the ultimate trial outcome because the jury’s decision, and appellate review of that decision, are deeply impacted by…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: IMPROPER TRADE SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION
Mavrick Law Firm

The act of misappropriating a trade secret is not one size fits all because there are two different types of misappropriation – acquisition and disclosure or use. Fla. Stat. § 688.002. Misappropriation under the acquisition theory occurs when a person obtains the trade secret knowing it was acquired through improper means or possesses reason to…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: COMMISSION PAYMENTS
Mavrick Law Firm

Many employers compensate their employees on a commission basis. Some employees are paid 100% on commission, while other employees receive commissions as part of their total compensation package. However, paying employees on a commission basis, whether in full or in part, can create legal disputes because the revenues generated by the employee’s commission related activities…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message