Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: PREDISPOSITION TO ENDING A BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP
Mavrick Law Firm

Lawsuits to prevent unlawful competition can take several forms. A lawsuit may involve the enforcement of a restrictive covenant like non-compete agreements, non-solicitation provisions, or non-disclosure agreements. These agreements are only permitted when supported by a legitimate business interest demonstrating the restrictive covenant provision is intended to prevent unlawful competition. White v. Mederi Caretenders Visiting…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: ACCOUNT STATED AND OPEN ACCOUNT
Mavrick Law Firm

Business litigants owed money by another usually sue for breach of contract. However, there are other common law claims that can be asserted along with, or instead of, breach of contract to recover a debt owed by another. One potential claim is called an account stated and other potential claim is called open account. The…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: NOMINAL PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT
Mavrick Law Firm

Attorney’s fees are only recoverable when authorized by statute of by agreement of the parties. Reiterer v. Monteil, 98 So. 3d 586 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (“[A]ttorney’s fees may be awarded by a court only when authorized by statute or by agreement of the parties.”). This can make recovering attorney’s fees challenging when there is…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT: INJUNCTION DISSOLUTION
Mavrick Law Firm

Plaintiffs in trade secrets lawsuits and non-compete lawsuits often seek and obtain injunctions preventing defendants from misappropriating the trade secrets or unlawfully competing. Florida’s trade secret statute expressly allows for injunction relief. Fla. Stat. § 688.003 (“Actual or threatened misappropriation may be enjoined.”). Florida’s restrictive covenant statute likewise allows for injunctive relief. Fla. Stat. §…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT: UNCLEAN HANDS
Mavrick Law Firm

Unclean hands is an equitable defense akin to fraud. Cong. Park Off. Condos II, LLC v. First-Citizens Bank & Tr. Co., 105 So. 3d 602 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). “It is a self-imposed ordinance that closes the doors of a court of equity to one tainted with inequitableness or bad faith relative to the matter…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: DEFAMATION BY IMPLICATION
Mavrick Law Firm

Normally, a defamation claim must be based on one or more false statements. Internet Sols. Corp. v. Marshall, 39 So. 3d 1201 (Fla. 2010) (“The elements of a claim for defamation are as follows: (1) publication; (2) falsity; (3) actor must act with knowledge or reckless disregard as to the falsity on a matter concerning…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT: AIDING AND ABETTING
Mavrick Law Firm

Businesses can face challenges when trying to enforce a non-compete agreement against a former employee or other similar actor because that former employee may be receiving assistance from a third-party who did not sign the non-compete agreement. Enforcing the non-compete against the former employee who is unlawfully competing will not by itself stop the third-party…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: EVIDENCE NEEDED TO OBTAIN FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Mavrick Law Firm

Individuals can become involved in lawsuits in different ways. Sometimes an individual must commence a lawsuit to protect his or her rights. Other times, an individual must defend himself or herself in a lawsuit brought by another. A third possibility is that an individual is the recipient of a subpoena for documents, testimony, or both…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: FRAUD BY OMISSION
Mavrick Law Firm

 While fraud typically includes a fraudulent misrepresentation, under certain circumstances, omission of facts can also constitute fraud. In Florida, the elements of a claim of fraud are “(1) a false statement concerning a specific material fact; (2) the maker’s knowledge that the representation is false; (3) an intention that the representation induces another’s reliance; and…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message