Close

Articles Posted in Business Litigation

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: PROVING TRADE SECRETS AND MEASURES TO RETAIN SECRECY

Under Florida law, a “trade secret” must be a “secret” to the extent it is not generally know, and where the owner has taken reasonable efforts to maintain its secrecy.  Florida law (at Section 688.002(4), Florida Statutes) defines a “trade secret” to mean “information, including a formula, pattern, compilation, program, device,…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: PROOF OF DAMAGES AT TRIAL

Florida appellate courts will scrutinize the method employed in calculating damages in business litigation, because this involves a pure question of law.  Precedent from the Supreme Court of Florida in W.W. Gay Mech. Contractor, Inc. v. Wharfside Two, Ltd., 545 So.2d 1348 (Fla. 1989) held that, generally, a business seeking…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: ENFORCING NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT BASED ON “EXTRAORDINARY OR SPECIALIZED TRAINING”

Florida law specifies, at Florida Statutes section 542.335, how and when a restrictive covenant (such as a non-compete agreement or non-solicitation agreement) may be enforced against a current or former employee. In a lawsuit to enforce an agreement that restricts or prohibits competition during or after the term of the…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: THE COMPUTER FRAUD AND ABUSE ACT

The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (sometimes referred to as the “CFAA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1030, is a federal law that prohibits access a computer and obtaining information without authorization or by exceeding authorized access.  The statute (at section 1030(a)(2)(C)) states that whoever “intentionally accesses a computer without authorization or…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: VALID LIQUIDATED DAMAGES PROVISIONS IN CONTRACTS

Parties to contracts sometimes include a “liquidated damages” provision, i.e., a certain financial amount in the event of a triggering event specified in the contract.  Liquidated damages provisions seek to ensure compliance with the parties bargain when damages would be difficult to determine from the parties’ vantage when they sign…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS BASED ON TRADE SECRETS AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

The State of Florida enacted Florida Statutes Section 542.335 to allow non-compete agreements where there is a “legitimate business interest.” Two frequently cited “legitimate business interests” are confidential information and trade secrets.  In an employment context, a non-compete agreement based on “[v]aluable confidential business or professional information” (referenced in Florida…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: FRAUD CLAIM AND DEFENSE OF CAVEAT EMPTOR

Florida law recognizes the doctrine of caveat emptor in commercial transactions.  Florida and some other jurisdictions understand this legal doctrine to mean “buyer beware,” thereby imposing on buyers in commercial real property transactions the legal obligation to investigate what they are buying.  Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal in Transcapital…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: WHERE WRITTEN CONTRACTS NEGATE CLAIMS OF FRAUD

Not every written contract is sufficiently comprehensive to address potential fraud claims. Under Florida law, however, a well-drafted written contract can bar a business litigation claim for fraud that essentially covers the same territory as the contract. Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal in Mac-Gray Servs., Inc. v. DeGeorge, 913…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: CLAIMS OF FRAUD AND RELIANCE ON SELLER’S MISREPRESENTATION

Miami’s Third District Court of Appeal in Moriber v. Dreiling, 194 So.3d 369 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016), explained that the elements for a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation and fraudulent inducement are the same, namely “(1) a false statement concerning a material fact; (2) the representor’s knowledge that the…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER FOREIGN CORPORATIONS

In business litigation, parties sometimes try to sue out-of-state corporations in the state where the plaintiff resides or conducts its business, i.e., the “home state.”  Federal Constitutional law, under due process clause as applied through the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, however, places limits on the ability to…

Contact Us