Close

Articles Posted in Business Litigation

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: PROTECTING A BUSINESS’ GOODWILL AS A LEGITIMATE BUSINESS INTEREST

Under Florida law, non-compete agreements are enforceable to protect a company’s customer, patient, or client goodwill. In business litigation, a business’ goodwill qualifies as a legitimate business interest under Section 542.335, Florida’s non-compete statute. “Florida statutory law (as a matter of public policy) does not allow a party to enforce…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADE SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION DURING EMPLOYMENT

In business litigation, claims for trade secret misappropriation often arise under Florida’s Uniform Trade Secret Act (“FUTSA”) or the Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”). For liability to attach under the DTSA and FUTSA, the information must be the fruit of wrongful acquisition, or misappropriation. The DTSA defines “misappropriation” to include…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: IDENTIFYING BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS FOR TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE CLAIMS

A prevalent issue arising in business litigation is whether a party wrongfully interfered with another parties’ business relationships. Parties in business litigation often assert claims under Florida law for tortious interference with their prospective or existing business relationships. These relationships must be identifiable. Such relationships are often governed by existing…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: ENFORCING NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS TO PROTECT TRADE SECRETS

Businesses can use non-compete agreements to protect their substantial business relationships with prospective and current customers, patients, or clients. A common issue in business litigation seeking to enforce non-compete agreements is whether a business has a trade secret that qualifies as a legitimate business interest. Peter Mavrick is a Fort…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: OBTAINING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF TO PROTECT TRADE SECRETS UNDER FUTSA

Business litigation often involve claims for trade secret misappropriation under Florida’s Uniform Trade Secret Act (FUTSA). Under certain circumstances, parties in business litigation may be entitled injunctive relief under FUTSA. A plaintiff seeking a temporary injunction to protect its trade secrets must show that there is an actual or likely…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: ENFORCING RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS UNDER FLORIDA LAW

Business litigation often involves contractual disputes between employers and employees concerning the enforceability of non-compete agreements or other restrictive covenants. Under Florida law, a contractual non-compete restriction cannot be used solely as a tool to eliminate competition or merely to prevent an employee from working with a competing employer in…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: REMEDIES FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE LANHAM ACT

The Lanham Act is a federal statute that protects businesses from various types of unfair competition, including trademark infringement. In business litigation, the Lanham Act permits trademark owners to sue other businesses or individuals for violating their trademark rights. The Lanham Act provides that “[w]hen a violation of any right of…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: SPECIAL DUTY EXCEPTION TO FLORIDA’S TEST FOR ESTABLISHING DIRECT STANDING

Business litigation often involves disputes between a corporate entity and its equity owners. In Florida, the corporation and the limited liability company are two common types of corporate entities. The owners of a corporation are known as shareholders, and the owners of a limited liability company are known as members.…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: DETERMINING THE LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION IN TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT CASES

The Lanham Act is a federal statute that protects businesses from various types of unfair competition, including trademark infringement. In business litigation, the Lanham Act permits trademark owners to sue other businesses or individuals for violating their trademark rights. To prevail on a claim of trademark infringement, a plaintiff must show:…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: FRAUDULENT INDUCEMENT CLAIMS IN FLORIDA

Claims for fraudulent inducement are common in business litigation. In an action for fraudulent inducement,  the “plaintiff must show that the fraudulent act induced the formation of contract between the parties.” GlobeTec Const., LLC v. Custom Screening & Crushing, Inc., 77 So. 3d 802 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). The elements…

Contact Us