Close

Articles Posted in Business Litigation

Updated:

DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: EMPLOYEE’S “FAILURE TO MITIGATE” DAMAGES REDUCES POSSIBLE RECOVERY

Parties generally have a duty to mitigate their damages under Florida law. A party’s “failure to mitigate” its damages is a defense commonly raised in employment litigation. “The doctrine of avoidance consequences, commonly referred to as a duty to mitigate damages, prevents a party from recovering those damages inflicted by…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: FRAUD DAMAGES VERSUS BREACH OF CONTRACT DAMAGES

A prevalent issue in business litigation  is whether a party can recover damages for fraud if the party also sues for breach of contract. “Under Florida law, ‘one can sue for breach of contract and fraudulent inducement to enter the very same contract, and obtain two recoveries.’” Guarantee Ins. Co.…

Updated:

DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: THE DOCTRINE OF RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR AND VICARIOUS LIABILITY

Respondeat superior is a common law doctrine which provides that an employer may be held liable for the actions of its employee if the employee was acting within the scope of his or her employment when committing the tortious or criminal act. Many businesses find themselves involved in litigation due…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: CHOICE OF LAW PROVISIONS DO NOT AUTOMATICALLY CONFER PERSONAL JURISDICTION

Florida businesses often include “choice of law” provisions in their contracts to identify the substantive state law that will govern disputes that may later arise under the contract. These provisions provide the contracting parties with a greater degree of certainty as to how certain claims ultimately resolve in the future.…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE TRADE SECRET LITIGATION: PREEMPTION UNDER FLORIDA’S UNIFORM TRADE SECRET ACT

Business litigation involving claims under Florida’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act (FUTSA) for trade secret misappropriation often also include similar additional claims for tortious interference, fraud, or violations of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA). However, these additional claims rarely survive past the pleading stage because FUTSA prohibits parties…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: ENFORCING ARBITRATION CLAUSES THAT ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

A common issue in contractual disputes is whether the claims can be compelled to arbitration. Arbitration is an alternative method of dispute resolution that parties sometimes agree to through a pre-dispute contract. Many Florida businesses operating online websites often include arbitration provisions in their website’s terms and conditions. These arbitration…

Updated:

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: FLORIDA’S “PRIOR BREACH” DEFENSE TO NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS

The “first to breach” or “prior breach” doctrine is a commonly raised defense by employees in actions brought by their former employers to enforce restrictive covenants. Under Florida law, an employer’s prior breach of its employment contract may prohibit the employer from enforcing restrictive covenants under the same agreement. Employees…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES IN NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS ARE ENFORCEABLE

Non-compete agreements between employers and their employees sometimes contain “forum selection clauses” that dictate where subsequent lawsuits related to the non-compete agreement can be filed. Under Florida and federal law, forum-selection clauses are presumptively valid absent a “strong showing” that enforcement would be unfair or unreasonable under the circumstances. It…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: AMBIGUOUS TERMS IN COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS

Courts are often tasked with interpreting commercial contracts. Unfortunately, contracts sometimes contain terms that do not clearly convey the intent of the contracting parties. Courts consider these terms as “ambiguous” for purposes of contract interpretation in commercial litigation. Generally, an agreement is ambiguous under Florida law if, as a whole…

Updated:

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: A PARTY CAN RECOVER CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES UNDER A CONTRACT WHEN THE DAMAGES ARE FORESEEABLE

A frequently litigated issue in contractual disputes is whether a non-breaching party can recover its alleged consequential damages arising under a contract. Consequential damages, or special damages, may include monetary losses stemming from lost profits. If a party can establish a breach under the contract, then a party may be…

Contact Us