As a defense to the enforcement of a contract, a party can claim the affirmative defense that the agreement is “unconscionable.” The unconscionability defense requires that the party claiming it show that both the substance of the agreement is unreasonably favorable to a party and that the agreement was made…
The unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic affected many Florida business’ ability to comply with their contractual obligations. Government quarantine measures as well as changes in economic conditions and consumer demand continue to influence contract compliance. Mavrick law released two articles at the outset of the pandemic concerning contractual disputes and COVID-19. The…
Noncompete agreements sometimes designate the laws of other states to govern the parties’ contractual obligations, even if the agreement is made in Florida. This is known as a choice of law provision. When these choice-of-law provisions are valid and enforceable, they can have significant repercussions on the results of noncompete…
The Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA) provides businesses with a civil cause of action against unscrupulous business practices. While FDUTPA has limitations, it is applicable in a wide variety of circumstances when a plaintiff can show that a defendant engaged in unfair or deceptive business practices against…
Misappropriation of a trade secret can occur when there is an acquisition of another’s trade secret by improper means or through disclosure or use of a trade secret without consent by a person who used improper means to acquire the trade secret or knew that the trade secret was improperly…
When a party appeals a court order before the conclusion of the case, the appellate court’s decision on the questions of law presented on appeal governs how the trial court decides those questions of law throughout all subsequent stages of the lawsuit. This concept is known as the “law of…
Distinguishing between a franchise relationship and an agency relationship can be difficult in a jury trial. A jury deciding may need to understand the difference between them in business litigation. The two relationships are distinguishable. In a franchise relationship, the franchisor and franchisee are separate businesses. The franchisor licenses its…
Parties who seek the forensic examination of a personal electronic device (like a computer, tablet or mobile phone) during business litigation need to address the other party’s privacy concerns. A forensic image, otherwise known as a “mirror image” will “replicate bit for bit sector for sector, all allocated and unallocated…
When the wording of a contractual provision is confusing or ambiguous, courts must interpret the contract in a rational manner. Some examples of vague contractual provisions include, “during business hours” and time frames with no clear anchor date, i.e. “within six months of commencement.” The courts generally agree that where…
Court appointment of a provisional director to a corporate entity is a remedy that recently became available in business litigation. Where corporate deadlock exists, a court has discretion to appoint a provisional director to a corporate entity “if it appears that such action by the court will remedy a situation…