Articles Posted in Business Litigation

MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: THE REQUIREMENT TO DISCLOSE IN TRADE SECRET LITIGATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

It is a common mistake in trade secret litigation for the company seeking protection for its trade secrets to fail to explain what trade secrets it wishes to protect. Courts require that plaintiffs describe their trade secret with a certain degree of particularity. Failing to do that can be fatal to trade secret claims. Peter…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: “DIRECT LAWSUITS” BETWEEN MEMBERS OF AN LLC
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Often, a member of a limited liability company can sue another member for a breach of an operating agreement in a corporate “derivative action” rather than in a “direct action” against the other member. This is because the victim is often the limited liability company, not the individual member. Aggrieved members of limited liability companies…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: FEDERAL COURTS APPLY STATE LAW IN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE LAWSUITS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A shareholder wishing to file a derivative suit must generally present that dispute to the board of directors with a demand prior to filing a shareholder’s derivative suit. The way that this demand process works can vary between the states and can ultimately determine whether a shareholder is able to proceed with a lawsuit. A…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT AND LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A company that successfully has its mark registered with the USPTO does not have immunity from other trademark owners claiming infringement. A trademark owner with a higher priority may nevertheless sue under the Lanham act if it can show that there is a “likelihood of confusion” between the two marks. Peter Mavrick is a Miami…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: FRAUD CLAIMS AND DEFENSE OF “PUFFERY”
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Disgruntled purchases of goods or services may later claim fraud by asserting that they relied on untrue statements made by the selling company when deciding to make the purchase. However, a purchaser generally may not rely on a statement that qualifies as “puffery.” A statement is puffery if it is merely a statement of opinion…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE CAN INSULATE DIRECTORS FROM LIABILITY
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The business judgment rule can shield directors of corporations, members of limited liability companies, and associations from liability against claims of negligent management. The business judgment rule is designed to prevent courts from “Monday morning quarterbacking” the decisions made by those in control of organizations merely because the plaintiff does not like the outcome of…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: DUTY OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Under Florida law, every contract has a duty of good faith and fair dealing. A party to a contract generally cannot subvert the very purpose of a contract through an improper exercise of its discretion. A party does not violate the duty of good faith and fair dealing, however, when the parties expressly contemplated the…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADEMARK PROTECTION FOR DISTINCT TRADE NAME
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida businesses seeking to protect their reputation may need to bring a lawsuit under the Lanham Act to protect their trademarks. Defendants in business litigation asserting trademark infringement sometimes defend on the grounds that the plaintiff’s trademark is “generic” and therefore cannot be protected under the Lanham Act. A recent case from the United States…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADE SECRET ACT PREEMPTION OF CLAIMS UNDER THE FLORIDA DECEPTIVE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES ACT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Plaintiffs may be tempted to bring as many causes of action into a legal complaint that the facts may allow. Diversity of causes of action in business litigation can provide the plaintiff with different types of remedies and help a suit endure should a legal defect arise concerning any particular cause of action. However, cases…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: PROOF OF INTENT WHEN CLAIMING FRAUD
Mavrick Law Firm Team

An aggrieved party to a contract will sometimes claim that they were fraudulently induced into entering the contract. These types of claims may often be difficult to prove. A plaintiff cannot prevail on a fraudulent inducement claim by simply showing that he or she was deceived. A plaintiff must also show evidence of a defendant’s…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message