Articles Posted in Business Litigation

FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LITIGATION: DISCLOSURE WITHOUT CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT OR CONFIDENTIAL RELATIONSHIP
Mavrick Law Firm Team

For a trade secret to be protectable under Florida law, a business must protect that information as confidential. Disclosure of trade secret information to parties without an understanding that the information must be protected as confidential can cause that information to no longer be a protectable trade secret. In the absence of an express confidentiality…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: JUDICIAL ANALYSIS OF INJUNCTIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF EMPLOYEE DEFENSES
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida employers seeking an injunction to stop their former employees from engaging in competition in violation of a non-compete agreement must demonstrate specific criteria to a court or tribunal. Under Section 542.335, Florida Statutes, an employer must plead and prove several facts to be entitled to a temporary injunction against a former employee breaching a…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: GUARANTORS AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES BASED ON UNDERLYING DEBT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

When a guarantor is sued based on an absolute guarantee of a debt, the guarantor may either challenge the validity of the guarantee or show that the guaranteed debt is not owed. Under Florida law, the guarantor can be held liable only when a court determines the guaranty is lawful and the alleged debt is…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: FRANCHISORS MAY HAVE A LEGITIMATE BUSINESS INTEREST IN RE-ENTERING MARKET SERVED BY TERMINATED FORMER FRANCHISEE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Franchisors will often include non-compete provisions in their Franchise Agreements to protect their ability to sell new franchises in a geographic region that was formerly served by a terminated franchisee. A party seeking to enforce a non-compete agreement must plead and prove the existence of one or more legitimate business interests justifying the non-compete covenant…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: ORDINARY COMPETITION MAY NOT CONSTITUTE A TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE CLAIM
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Tortious interference is the intentional and unjustified interference with a relationship or contract that results in damages. However, tortious interference does not occur every time a contract or business relationship is consequentially affected. Direct interference is a necessary element of the tort (a wrongful act or an infringement of a right). Peter Mavrick is a…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: ARBITRATION PROVISIONS AND THEIR SCOPE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Under Florida and federal law, whether a legal dispute is subject to the requirement that the parties submit to arbitration (what courts refer to as the “arbitrability” of the dispute) depends on what the wording of the arbitration agreement itself states. The parties’ intent as to what issues are to be arbitrated is typically evident…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: UNDEFINED TERMS IN NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS MAY LIMIT THE PROTECTION AFFORDED BY THE CONTRACT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

An undefined term in a non-compete agreement creates an ambiguity in the contract, and therefore uncertainty in a court’s interpretation of the term. When a term is left undefined, Florida law requires courts to give the term its ordinary meaning. Although the terms “compete” and “line of business” may seem self-explanatory, the context in which…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADE SECRET AND NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT LITIGATION: TRADE SECRETS MUST BE CLOSELY GUARDED TO BE PROTECTABLE UNDER FLORIDA AND FEDERAL LAW
Mavrick Law Firm Team

For a business to be to protect its confidential information as a protectable trade secrets under the Florida Uniform Trade Secret Act, the business must preserve the secrecy of its confidential information. There are no hard and fast rules that must be followed for a business to protect its confidential information as a trade secret.…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: CORPORATE OWNERSHIP WHEN NO STOCK CERTIFICATES WERE ISSUED
Mavrick Law Firm Team

It is a fundamental premise that ownership of a corporation is evidenced by stock certificates. However, this is not always the case with small, closely held corporations that do not sell stock on a market. Sometimes those corporations do not issue certificates. To accommodate that realty, Florida law allows for the equitable or beneficial ownership…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LITIGATION: TRADE SECRET INJUNCTIONS MUST BE SPECIFIC ENOUGH FOR AN ORDINARY PERSON TO UNDERSTAND
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Protection of trade secrets and proprietary information from a business’ competitors can be a critical part of owning a company. An injunction may become necessary to stop a competing company from possessing or using those trade secrets for their own benefit. The injunction, however, must be specific enough for the enjoined party to understand what…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message