Articles Posted in Business Litigation

FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL ONLY PERMITS A NON-SIGNATORIES TO COMPEL ARBITRATION UNDER AN AGREEMENT IN LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Equitable estoppel is a legal doctrine that essentially prevents one party from taking unfair advantage of another party. Equitable estoppel allows a non-signatory to a contract to compel arbitration of a signatory’s claims against them, if the signatory raised allegations of concerted misconduct by both the non-signatory and one or more of the signatories to…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION: “LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION” MUST BE ESTABLISHED IN A COUNTERFEIT CLAIM WHERE MARKS ARE NOT “SUBSTANTIALLY INDISTINGUISHABLE”
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Under the Lanham Act, a defendant may be liable for trademark infringement, if, without consent, he/she uses “in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark” which “is likely to cause confusion or to cause mistake, or to deceive.” 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1). The Act defines a “counterfeit” as a “spurious…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LITIGATION: COURTS SCRUTINIZE TRADE SECRET INFORMATION WHEN RULING ON PROTECTIVE ORDERS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Protection of trade secrets and proprietary information is critical when a business receives a subpoena for its business information and documents. Even when a business is not a party to a lawsuit, it can be compelled to produce sensitive information that can cause irreparable harm. It is often necessary to seek an order of protection…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION: ACCOUNTING OF DEFENDANT’S PROFITS DEPENDS ON A SHOWING OF WILLFULL INFRINGEMENT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The Lanham Act provides that a successful plaintiff may recover: (1) defendant’s profits, (2) any damages sustained by the plaintiff, and (3) costs of the action. 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a). In exceptional cases, a district court may award attorney fees to the prevailing party. The Lanham Act gives broad discretion to the district court to…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: DEFENSE AGAINST CLAIMS ASSERTING “INTRACORPORATE CONSPIRACY”
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Aggrieved litigants can claim they are victims of a conspiracy – that a group of persons has agreed to perform an unlawful act and damaged them. Such claims can expose multiple parties to liability for the same conduct by allegedly contributing to harm against the plaintiff. A “conspirator” can be found responsible for a harm…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NONCOMPETE AGREEMENTS: STIPULATIONS TO IRREPARABLE INJURY IN NON-COMPETE CONTRACTS MAY NOT BE ENFORCEABLE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

It has long been recognized that before injunctive relief can be granted a movant must show irreparable injury. Langford v. Rotech Oxygen & Medical Equipment, Inc., 541 So.2d 1267 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Many non-compete contracts will contain a provision that stipulates that a violation of the restrictive covenant not to compete would create an…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW AND BUYING OR SELLING A BUSINESS: COURTS SCRUTINIZE THE CONTRACTUAL WORDING WHEN DECIDING THE MEANING OF A NON-COMPETE COVENANT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Purchasers of businesses and business assets often protect their investment by requiring the seller to sign a non-compete agreement. If the seller continued to engage in the same services, there would be little to no incentive for customers to buy from the Purchasers. The contract must specify the type of services that are prohibited by…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: ACTIONS TAKEN IN RELATION TO AN OFFER OF EMPLOYMENT MAY BE CONSIDERED SOLICITATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida employers often require employees to sign non-solicitation agreements to protect their business from having its employees poached. Non-solicitation agreements often fail to define the term “solicit.” Solicitation is defined in Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019), as “[t]he act or an instance of requesting or seeking to obtain something; a request or petition.” Cases…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LAW: PROTECTING TRADE SECRETS DURING PUBLIC RECORDS COMPLIANCE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Businesses submitting licensing applications with state or local government agencies are often required to file confidential documents and financial records. The State of Florida has a broad public records policy requiring that “all state, county, and municipal records…[shall be]…open for personal inspection and copying by any person.” Florida Statute § 119.01(1). Businesses are often confronted…

Continue reading ›
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION: PRODUCT DESIGNS THAT ARE FUNCTIONAL MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO TRADE DRESS PROTECTION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The term ‘trade dress’ refers to the appearance of a product when that appearance is used to identify the creator of that product. Trade dress encompasses the total image of a product and may include features such as size, shape, color, texture, graphics, or particular sales techniques.” AmBrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message