Articles Posted in Business Litigation

FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: ATTORNEY’S FEES AND COSTS MAY NOT BE AWARDED FOR AIDING AND ABETTING VIOLATION OF NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

It is common in lawsuits regarding non-compete agreements for plaintiffs to sue the new enterprise started by the former employee or the company that hires the former employee, i.e. a third party. Plaintiffs seek to enjoin these third parties from aiding and abetting the violation of the non-compete, as well as, hold them liable for…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: FLORIDA AND FEDERAL COURTS BROADLY INTERPRET AMBIGUOUS ARBITRATION CONTRACTS IN FAVOR OF REQUIRING ARBITRATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Businesses often prefer to resolve their disputes by arbitration rather than litigation. When two parties who have entered into an agreement to arbitrate their disputes, that agreement to arbitrate is usually enforceable by either party. Frequently, one party may renege on its agreement to arbitrate for strategic reasons and attempt to avoid arbitrating the dispute…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LITIGATION: CLAIMS OF TRADE SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION MAY PREEMPT FILING ALTERNATIVE CLAIMS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Plaintiffs in litigation often allege as many types of claims as are applicable to the facts of their case. This practice essentially allows a party to plead alternative claims for different types of relief based on the same nucleus of facts. Under Florida law, a trade secret claim may preempt, i.e. supersede or displace, pleading…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: A NON-COMPETE THAT EXCEEDS TWO YEARS MAY BE JUSTIFIED BY THE INTEREST PROTECTED AND THE IMPORTANCE OF THE FORMER EMPLOYEE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Section 542.335(1)(d), Florida Statutes, states that a non-compete agreement, in an employment context that exceeds two years is subject to a legal presumption that the non-compete period is unreasonable. An employer may overcome this legal presumption in variety of ways. If the court finds that a longer non-compete period is necessary to protect a legitimate…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LITIGATION: AN IDEA OR CONCEPT REQUIRES SUFFICIENT SUBSTANCE TO QUALIFY AS A PROTECTED TRADE SECRET
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Many businesses create new business concepts. A business concept, however, does not automatically evolve from an interesting idea to a legally protected trade secret. A concept doesn’t need to be built to be protected, but the concept needs enough substance to be economically valuable and for a court to know what it’s protecting. Peter Mavrick…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: THE PRACTICAL USE OF DECLARATORY JUDGMENT LAWSUITS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

It is not uncommon for parties in a business relationship, such as partners, franchisors and franchisees, and employers and employees, to discover that they cannot agree on their rights with respect to each other. Sometimes contracts are ambiguous, or the parties never determined how they would address a particular problem that later arises. Florida law…

Continue reading ›
ENFORCEMENT OF FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS AND THE POSTING OF A BOND
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A business can seek an injunction to enforce a non-compete agreement before a lawsuit is completed if the business is suffering losses due to the violation of a non-compete agreement. There are different legal standards for issuance of a temporary injunction, depending on whether the lawsuit and motion occur in federal or state court. The…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: ENFORCEABILITY OF “UNILATERAL” ARBITRATION PROVISIONS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Arbitration can be a useful tool to thwart unwanted litigation, and, therefore, contracting parties often include mandatory arbitration provisions in contracts to discourage unnecessary litigation. See, e.g., Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela, 139 S. Ct. 1407, 1412 (2019) (prohibiting employees from asserting a class action arbitration unless the class waived their right to sue in…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION, PART TWO: CONTRACTUAL “INTEGRATION” OR “MERGER” CLAUSES CAN REDUCE UNCERTAINTY IN BREACH OF CONTRACT LAWSUITS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

This article is the second in a two-part series on contractual “merger” or “integration” clauses (the terms merger and integration are used interchangeably). Integration/merger clauses purport to define a contract as being limited to only what is contained in the written document signed by the parties. This can help ensure that neither party will later…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION, PART ONE: CONTRACTUAL “INTEGRATION” OR “MERGER” CLAUSES CAN REDUCE UNCERTAINTY IN BREACH OF CONTRACT LAWSUITS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

This article is part one in a two-part series of articles on contractual “merger” or “integration” clauses, which purport to limit the terms of a contract to the terms contained in the written document signed by the parties. This can help ensure that neither party will later claim that he was promised something as part…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message