Articles Posted in Business Litigation

FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: COURTS SCRUTINIZE THE CONTRACTUAL WORDING WHEN DECIDING THE SCOPE OF A NON-COMPETE COVENANT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A party seeking a temporary injunction to enforce a non-compete agreement must establish four elements: (1) a likelihood of irreparable harm and the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law; (2) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (3) the threatened injury to the petitioner outweighs any possible harm to the respondent, and (4)…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION: TIME BARRED CLAIMS ARE SUBJECT TO LACHES DEFENSE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The Lanham Act does not contain a statute of limitations. When the filing of a trademark infringement lawsuit is delayed for years, the defendants may instead assert laches as an affirmative defense. Federal courts use the limitations period for analogous state law claims as a standard for the defense of laches. Peter Mavrick is a…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: ANTITRUST ISSUES WHEN EMPLOYERS AGREE NOT TO SOLICT EACH OTHER’S EMPLOYEES
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Many employers possess confidential information vital to generating profits. Employers routinely entrust employees with this information to facilitate business operations, but employees often leave their job after a few years to work for a competitor. When this happens, the employee takes the confidential information he or she learned to the next job. The employee might…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: CLAIMS FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES DO NOT IMPOSE ADDITIONAL BURDENS ON PLAINTIFFS ASSERTING FRAUD CLAIMS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Punitive damages punish and dissuade wrong-doers from committing egregious acts by increasing the damages award to exceed compensable injuries. Cooper Indus., Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc., 532 U.S. 424, 432 (2001) (the purpose of punitive damages is to punish and deter future wrongdoing); Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc., 945 So. 2d 1246, 1265 (Fla.…

Continue reading ›
ARBITRATION AND BUSINESS LITIGATION: COURTS CAN DEEM PARTIES BOUND BY ARBITRATION CLAUSE FROM A SEPARATE WRITTEN CONTRACT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

When parties execute two separate contracts and only one contract contains an arbitration clause, generally the parties cannot be compelled to arbitrate disputes arising from the contract that does not call for arbitration. However, under certain circumstances courts will extend the arbitration provisions from one contract to a separate contract, and the parties may be…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA ARBITRATION LAW: WHEN CAN THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES TO A CONTRACT BE COMPELLED TO ARBITRATE?
Mavrick Law Firm Team

An important trend in business contracts today involves the use of arbitration provisions to resolve some or all contemplated disputes that may arise between parties to the contract and sometimes “third-party beneficiaries” of the contract. Contracts are often made for the benefit of a third-party who did not sign the agreements. A third-party beneficiary is…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LAW: PROTECTING TRADE SECRETS DURING LITIGATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A temporary injunction is often an effective protection for to prevent an adversary from using stolen trade secrets, such as a customer list. Peter Mavrick is a Fort Lauderdale trade secret lawyer who represents businesses in trade secret litigation. In the case of I.C. Systems, Inc. v. Oliff, 824 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 4th DCA…

Continue reading ›
PROTECTION OF TRADE SECRETS FROM LITIGATION DISCOVERY
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Businesses often envision that litigation over trade secrets will generally involve a direct lawsuit by or against a person or company that steals or divulges such information in violation of a position of trust. However, trade secrets can come under attack by way of a discovery requests in litigation where the owner of the trade…

Continue reading ›
TRADE SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION BY CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES IN FLORIDA
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Trade secrets are a form of intellectual property that are maintained in secrecy. There is no bright line rule that the courts use to determine whether an employee should be enjoined from utilizing a corporation’s trade secrets. The courts must first determine whether the information in question constitutes a trade secret. Courts also look to…

Continue reading ›
TRADE SECRET LITIGATION: MISAPPROPRIATION OF TRADE SECRETS BY A BUSINESS RIVAL
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Intellectual property is the foundation for innovation and ingenuity. Protecting your intellectual property rights, both as an individual or business, is essential to maintaining an economic advantage over your competitors. Trade secrets are one of the most controversial forms of intellectual property because the information is maintained in secrecy. By contrast, other intellectual property, such…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message