Articles Posted in Business Litigation

FLORIDA NONCOMPETE AGREEMENTS: STIPULATIONS TO IRREPARABLE INJURY IN NON-COMPETE CONTRACTS MAY NOT BE ENFORCEABLE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

It has long been recognized that before injunctive relief can be granted a movant must show irreparable injury. Langford v. Rotech Oxygen & Medical Equipment, Inc., 541 So.2d 1267 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Many non-compete contracts will contain a provision that stipulates that a violation of the restrictive covenant not to compete would create an…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW AND BUYING OR SELLING A BUSINESS: COURTS SCRUTINIZE THE CONTRACTUAL WORDING WHEN DECIDING THE MEANING OF A NON-COMPETE COVENANT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Purchasers of businesses and business assets often protect their investment by requiring the seller to sign a non-compete agreement. If the seller continued to engage in the same services, there would be little to no incentive for customers to buy from the Purchasers. The contract must specify the type of services that are prohibited by…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: ACTIONS TAKEN IN RELATION TO AN OFFER OF EMPLOYMENT MAY BE CONSIDERED SOLICITATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida employers often require employees to sign non-solicitation agreements to protect their business from having its employees poached. Non-solicitation agreements often fail to define the term “solicit.” Solicitation is defined in Black’s Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019), as “[t]he act or an instance of requesting or seeking to obtain something; a request or petition.” Cases…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LAW: PROTECTING TRADE SECRETS DURING PUBLIC RECORDS COMPLIANCE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Businesses submitting licensing applications with state or local government agencies are often required to file confidential documents and financial records. The State of Florida has a broad public records policy requiring that “all state, county, and municipal records…[shall be]…open for personal inspection and copying by any person.” Florida Statute § 119.01(1). Businesses are often confronted…

Continue reading ›
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION: PRODUCT DESIGNS THAT ARE FUNCTIONAL MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO TRADE DRESS PROTECTION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The term ‘trade dress’ refers to the appearance of a product when that appearance is used to identify the creator of that product. Trade dress encompasses the total image of a product and may include features such as size, shape, color, texture, graphics, or particular sales techniques.” AmBrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: COURTS SCRUTINIZE THE CONTRACTUAL WORDING WHEN DECIDING THE SCOPE OF A NON-COMPETE COVENANT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A party seeking a temporary injunction to enforce a non-compete agreement must establish four elements: (1) a likelihood of irreparable harm and the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law; (2) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (3) the threatened injury to the petitioner outweighs any possible harm to the respondent, and (4)…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION: TIME BARRED CLAIMS ARE SUBJECT TO LACHES DEFENSE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The Lanham Act does not contain a statute of limitations. When the filing of a trademark infringement lawsuit is delayed for years, the defendants may instead assert laches as an affirmative defense. Federal courts use the limitations period for analogous state law claims as a standard for the defense of laches. Peter Mavrick is a…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: ANTITRUST ISSUES WHEN EMPLOYERS AGREE NOT TO SOLICT EACH OTHER’S EMPLOYEES
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Many employers possess confidential information vital to generating profits. Employers routinely entrust employees with this information to facilitate business operations, but employees often leave their job after a few years to work for a competitor. When this happens, the employee takes the confidential information he or she learned to the next job. The employee might…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: CLAIMS FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES DO NOT IMPOSE ADDITIONAL BURDENS ON PLAINTIFFS ASSERTING FRAUD CLAIMS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Punitive damages punish and dissuade wrong-doers from committing egregious acts by increasing the damages award to exceed compensable injuries. Cooper Indus., Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc., 532 U.S. 424, 432 (2001) (the purpose of punitive damages is to punish and deter future wrongdoing); Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc., 945 So. 2d 1246, 1265 (Fla.…

Continue reading ›
ARBITRATION AND BUSINESS LITIGATION: COURTS CAN DEEM PARTIES BOUND BY ARBITRATION CLAUSE FROM A SEPARATE WRITTEN CONTRACT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

When parties execute two separate contracts and only one contract contains an arbitration clause, generally the parties cannot be compelled to arbitrate disputes arising from the contract that does not call for arbitration. However, under certain circumstances courts will extend the arbitration provisions from one contract to a separate contract, and the parties may be…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message