Articles Posted in Business Litigation

TRADE SECRET AND NON-COMPETE LITIGATION: A BUSINESS’S CUSTOMER LIST JUSTIFYING ENFORCEMENT OF A NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

As a business owner, ensuring that your customer list is adequately protected can often be a challenging task. Employees who have direct access to a customer list can misappropriate that information and use it to compete directly against the business. Fortunately, a business’s customer list may qualify as a trade secret to justify the enforcement…

Continue reading ›
TRADE SECRET LITIGATION: INVOKING THE TRADE SECRET PRIVILEGE TO RESIST PRODUCTION DURING DISCOVERY
Mavrick Law Firm Team

During discovery opposing parties request the production of relevant evidence and documents to encourage fair judicial proceedings and case settlements. Although the rules of both state and federal civil procedure are broad enough to encompass most discovery requests, not everything that a party requests is discoverable. There are certain objections and privileges that exist to…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS WITH ENTITIES SOLICITING BIDS VIA OPEN BIDDING PROCESS ARE GENERALLY NOT PROTECTED IN FLORIDA
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Competitive bidding is common for many businesses, including construction companies, supply companies, and retail providers, among others. In most cases, an entity will solicit bids from competing bidders through a request for proposal (RFP) and will award a contract to the most attractive bid, which can depend on several factors. Although competitive bidding can lead…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LAW: MISAPPROPRIATION AND BURDEN OF PROOF UNDER FLORIDA’S UNIFORM TRADE SECRETS ACT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

To have legal recourse for the misappropriation of a trade secret under Florida law, a plaintiff must: (1) prove the existence of a trade secret; (2) prove that it took reasonable measures to protect the trade secret; and (3) demonstrate that the trade secret was misappropriated. See Del Monte Fresh Produce Co. v. Dole Food…

Continue reading ›
BUSINESSES CAN PROTECT THEIR TRADE SECRETS FROM DISCLOSURE BY FORMER EMPLOYEES DESPITE LACK OF A NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Fla. Stat. Sections 688.001-688.009 (the “Act”), prohibits the misappropriation of a business’ trade secrets even if the business does not have a non-disclosure or similar agreement with the disclosing party. Misappropriation generally includes the improper possession of, or the disclosure of, a trade secret: “misappropriation” is fully defined in section…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA ARBITRATION LAW: ATTACKING THE VALIDITY OF A CONTRACT DOES NOT INVALIDATE ARBITRATION PROVISIONS CONTAINED THEREIN
Mavrick Law Firm Team

It has become common practice for businesses to include arbitration provisions within agreements. Arbitration provides businesses a more efficient and less costly alternative to expensive, time-consuming litigation. Normally, arbitration provisions are drafted very broadly to cover all disputes or controversies that could arise between the contractual parties, commonly using the wording “arising from” or “relating…

Continue reading ›
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION: PROVISIONAL RELIEF – A LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE COURTS CAN INTERFERE WITH ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Arbitration proceedings, and their outcomes, are generally not subject to the interference or review of a court. However, Section 682.031 of the Revised Florida Arbitration Code allows courts to issue and review provisional remedies that involve parties to ongoing arbitration proceeding. Provisional remedies can protect an arbitration-party to the same extent that the party would…

Continue reading ›
BUSINESS LITIGATION: THE PRE-SUIT DEMAND REQUIREMENT FOR CORPORATE DERIVATIVE ACTIONS IN FLORIDA
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A derivative lawsuit is a lawsuit whereby a shareholder of a corporation sues a third party on behalf of the corporation. Any recovery from such lawsuits are the property of the corporation, not the shareholder who brought the lawsuit. Often times, the defendant of a derivative lawsuit will be someone close to the corporation, such…

Continue reading ›
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION: UNDER FLORIDA LAW, ACTIVE PARTICIPATION IN LAWSUITS WAIVES A PARTY’S RIGHT TO ARBITRATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Today, many businesses are including arbitration provisions for the resolution of any disputes or controversies that may arise from the contract. This is because arbitration provides a more efficient and less costly alternative to litigation. Despite the existence of such arbitration provisions within business contracts, often times, when a dispute arises, a plaintiff will still…

Continue reading ›
BUSINESS LITIGATION: BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS WITH ENTITIES SOLICITING BIDS VIA OPEN BIDDING PROCESS ARE GENERALLY NOT PROTECTED IN FLORIDA
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Competitive bidding is common for many businesses, including construction companies, supply companies, and retail providers, among others. In most cases, an entity will solicit bids from competing bidders through a request for proposal (RFP) and will award a contract to the most attractive bid, which can depend on several factors. Although competitive bidding can lead…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message