Articles Posted in Business Litigation

FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LITIGATION: AN IDEA OR CONCEPT REQUIRES SUFFICIENT SUBSTANCE TO QUALIFY AS A PROTECTED TRADE SECRET
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Many businesses create new business concepts. A business concept, however, does not automatically evolve from an interesting idea to a legally protected trade secret. A concept doesn’t need to be built to be protected, but the concept needs enough substance to be economically valuable and for a court to know what it’s protecting. Peter Mavrick…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: THE PRACTICAL USE OF DECLARATORY JUDGMENT LAWSUITS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

It is not uncommon for parties in a business relationship, such as partners, franchisors and franchisees, and employers and employees, to discover that they cannot agree on their rights with respect to each other. Sometimes contracts are ambiguous, or the parties never determined how they would address a particular problem that later arises. Florida law…

Continue reading ›
ENFORCEMENT OF FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS AND THE POSTING OF A BOND
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A business can seek an injunction to enforce a non-compete agreement before a lawsuit is completed if the business is suffering losses due to the violation of a non-compete agreement. There are different legal standards for issuance of a temporary injunction, depending on whether the lawsuit and motion occur in federal or state court. The…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: ENFORCEABILITY OF “UNILATERAL” ARBITRATION PROVISIONS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Arbitration can be a useful tool to thwart unwanted litigation, and, therefore, contracting parties often include mandatory arbitration provisions in contracts to discourage unnecessary litigation. See, e.g., Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela, 139 S. Ct. 1407, 1412 (2019) (prohibiting employees from asserting a class action arbitration unless the class waived their right to sue in…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION, PART TWO: CONTRACTUAL “INTEGRATION” OR “MERGER” CLAUSES CAN REDUCE UNCERTAINTY IN BREACH OF CONTRACT LAWSUITS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

This article is the second in a two-part series on contractual “merger” or “integration” clauses (the terms merger and integration are used interchangeably). Integration/merger clauses purport to define a contract as being limited to only what is contained in the written document signed by the parties. This can help ensure that neither party will later…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION, PART ONE: CONTRACTUAL “INTEGRATION” OR “MERGER” CLAUSES CAN REDUCE UNCERTAINTY IN BREACH OF CONTRACT LAWSUITS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

This article is part one in a two-part series of articles on contractual “merger” or “integration” clauses, which purport to limit the terms of a contract to the terms contained in the written document signed by the parties. This can help ensure that neither party will later claim that he was promised something as part…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: PUBLIC POLICY RARELY AFFECTS FLORIDA COURTS’ ANALYSIS OF WHETHER TO ENFORCE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Generally, a non-compete agreement is enforceable if it is in writing, supports an employer’s legitimate business interest, and is not overly restrictive in its duration and geographical area. See Florida Statute § 542.335. The Florida Statute governing non-compete agreements lists several public policy considerations that appear, at first blush, to be an impediment to the…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: “LEGITIMATE BUSINESS INTERESTS” NOT ARTICULATED UNDER THE NON-COMPETE STATUTE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Agreements in restraints of trade are generally void unless they comply with the procedures of § 542.335, Florida Statutes. The statute requires that any agreement restraining trade, such as a non-compete or non-solicitation agreement, be supported by a “legitimate business interest.” An agreement restraining trade can only be enforced to the extent that the agreement…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: NON-CONSUMER LAWSUITS UNDER FLORIDA’S DECEPTIVE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES ACT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (“FDUTPA”), § 501.201 et seq, Florida Statutes, allows a person to sue a business for unfair competition and deceptive or unconscionable business practices. Although the statute allows a consumer to sue a business for violations of FDUTPA, Florida appellate court decisions have also allowed some businesses to sue…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LITIGATION: THE MEANING OF THE TERM “INDEPENDENT ECONOMIC VALUE”
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida law can protect companies when their trade secrets are stolen. For such protections to apply, the confidential information at issue must qualify as a “trade secret” as defined by the Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“FUTSA”). Fla. Stat. 688.001, et seq. Generally, something can be a trade secret if derives “independent economic value from…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message