Articles Posted in Employment Law

DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: DEFEATING BAD FAITH CLAIMS OF RETALIATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Certain types of employee complaints to an employer qualify as “protected activity.” An employer that responds to a protected complaint by terminating, demoting, or otherwise taking an adverse employment action against the employee risks being sued for retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or the Florida Civil Rights Act of…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA EMPLOYMENT LAW: “REVERSE” AGE DISCRIMINATION IS NOT PROHIBITED UNDER FLORIDA OR FEDERAL LAW
Mavrick Law Firm Team

While courts may allow employees to bring claims of “reverse discrimination” concerning sex, race, or religion, an employee may not bring a claim of “reverse” age discrimination under current interpretations of the Federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) or the Florida Civil Rights Act (“FCRA”). The different way that age is treated when contrasted…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: RESTRICTION ON DOCTORS SEEING PATIENTS WITHIN A SPECIFIC COUNTY MAY BE ENFORCEABLE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Contracts that restrict or prohibit competition during or after the term of employment are enforceable, “so long as such contracts are reasonable in time, area, and line of business…” Florida Statute § 542.335. A non-compete provision that prohibits a doctor from seeing any patients from medical practice that formerly employed him/her, is not overbroad, provided…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: FLORIDA’S REVISED ARBITRATION CODE ALLOWS PARTIES TO SEEK PROVISIONAL REMEDIES EVEN WHEN THEY CONTRACTUALLY AGREED TO ARBITRATE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The Florida Arbitration Code provides businesses with flexibility in resolving their conflicts through arbitration. Arbitration is an immensely popular method of conflict resolution for Florida business litigation and employment litigation. Arbitration can generally help resolve disputes more quickly than litigation. However, parties to arbitration sometimes need court intervention via “provisional remedies,” i.e., a court ruling…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: CHANGES IN FEDERAL APPELLATE COURT INTERPRETATIONS OF WHAT IS CONSIDERED SEX DISCRIMINATION UNDER FEDERAL LAW
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Any employee claiming illegal sex discrimination must show that an employer took an adverse employment action, such as hiring, firing, promoting, or discipling an employee, and that action was motivated by the sex of the employee. Avoiding sex discrimination claims is complicated by the fact that the definition of “sex” as it is understood in…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA EMPLOYMENT AND NONCOMPETE LITIGATION: EMPLOYERS SHOULD CAREFULLY DRAFT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS TO AVOID FURTHER LITIGATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Employers in litigation against their employees face the challenge of not only dealing with the claims made by those employees, but the threat of being left to pay the attorneys’ fees bill of their opponents. Employers can mitigate that risk, and sometimes even turn the tables and win their attorneys’ fees from their former employees,…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS ACCUSED OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT: ISOLATED INCIDENTS OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT ARE RARELY VIABLE CLAIMS UNDER TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT AND THE FLORIDA CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

An aggrieved employee suing his or her employer for “sexual harassment” must present evidence that his workplace is such a hostile and abusive work environment because of his or her sex that it alters the conditions of his employment. An aggrieved employee does not make an actionable claim if he or she has suffered only…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: FEDERAL APPELLATE COURT AFFIRMS DISMISSAL OF RACE DISCRIMINATION LAWSUIT BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE FAILED TO LOGICALLY PROVE DISCRIMINATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Employers in Florida are free to use all lawful criteria in deciding which employees to promote within the business. It is well known that Florida and federal law prohibit employment discrimination based on various characteristics, such as race, age, national origin, sex, or religious affiliation. When considering employment discrimination lawsuits, Florida and federal courts have…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: PLAINTIFF’S INITIAL BURDEN OF PROOF MUST INCLUDE SHOWING THAT COMPARATORS WERE TREATED DIFFERENTLY
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A plaintiff alleging intentional discrimination must present sufficient facts to permit a jury to rule in his or her favor. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973) established a burden-shifting framework to test the sufficiency of the facts in plaintiff’s discrimination claim. Under McDonnell Douglas, the plaintiff bears the initial burden of establishing…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: COURTS SCRUTINIZE THE CONTRACTUAL WORDING WHEN DECIDING THE SCOPE OF A NON-COMPETE COVENANT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A party seeking a temporary injunction to enforce a non-compete agreement must establish four elements: (1) a likelihood of irreparable harm and the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law; (2) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (3) the threatened injury to the petitioner outweighs any possible harm to the respondent, and (4)…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message