Articles Posted in Employment Law

DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: PLAINTIFF’S INITIAL BURDEN OF PROOF MUST INCLUDE SHOWING THAT COMPARATORS WERE TREATED DIFFERENTLY
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A plaintiff alleging intentional discrimination must present sufficient facts to permit a jury to rule in his or her favor. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973) established a burden-shifting framework to test the sufficiency of the facts in plaintiff’s discrimination claim. Under McDonnell Douglas, the plaintiff bears the initial burden of establishing…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: COURTS SCRUTINIZE THE CONTRACTUAL WORDING WHEN DECIDING THE SCOPE OF A NON-COMPETE COVENANT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A party seeking a temporary injunction to enforce a non-compete agreement must establish four elements: (1) a likelihood of irreparable harm and the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law; (2) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (3) the threatened injury to the petitioner outweighs any possible harm to the respondent, and (4)…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: ANTITRUST ISSUES WHEN EMPLOYERS AGREE NOT TO SOLICT EACH OTHER’S EMPLOYEES
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Many employers possess confidential information vital to generating profits. Employers routinely entrust employees with this information to facilitate business operations, but employees often leave their job after a few years to work for a competitor. When this happens, the employee takes the confidential information he or she learned to the next job. The employee might…

Continue reading ›
RECENT FEDERAL APPELLATE COURT RULING ASSISTS FLORIDA EMPLOYERS IN THEIR DEFENSE AGAINST EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LAWSUITS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A recent decision from the federal appellate court that decides the legal standards for employment discrimination claims in Florida federal courts made it much easier for employers to defend against employment discrimination lawsuits. Under federal law, a plaintiff’s burden in an intentional-discrimination claim includes the burden to present evidence of other individuals who are “similarly…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING BUSINESSES FROM TRUCK LOADERS SUING FOR OVERTIME WAGES–PART TWO
Mavrick Law Firm Team

This is Part Two of the two-part series of articles discussing the overtime wage exemption of truck loaders under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Following the United State Supreme Court’s decisions discussed in Part One, the United States Department of Labor (DOL) issued regulations interpreting the Motor Carrier Act Exemption set forth at 29…

Continue reading ›
EXEMPTION OF LOADERS OF MOTOR VEHICLES FROM OVERTIME AND MINIMUM WAGE LAWS–PART ONE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

This article is Part One in a two-part series of articles discussing the exemption of loaders from the wage-hour requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Businesses whose works load large trucks transporting goods in interstate commerce can defend themselves from overtime and minimum wage claims. Under the Motor Carrier Act exemption to the…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING EMPLOYERS AGAINST WORKPLACE DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS BASED ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Most discrimination claims against Florida employers are based on Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act or under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992. A relatively recent case in the federal appellate court that has jurisdiction over Florida federal courts held that claims based on sexual orientation are not covered by the federal…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS IN OVERTIME PAY DISPUTES: RECENT UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT RULING THAT SERVICE ADVISORS ARE EXEMPT FROM OVERTIME WAGES
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires employers to pay overtime compensation to certain employees. 29 U. S. C. §201. There are, however, exceptions to the rule. In automobile dealerships, “any salesman, partsman, or mechanic primarily engaged in selling or servicing automobiles…” is exempt and not entitled to overtime wages. §213(b)(10)(A) ( “FLSA exemption”). The…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION DEFENSE: REQUIRING A DOCTOR’S NOTE IS NOT DISCRIMINATION OR RETALIATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Employers often face the situation where an employee seeks to return to work after medical leave but may no longer be able to handle the duties of his or her job. It is unlawful to terminate an employee for taking medical leave or for having a disability. However, it is lawful for an employer to…

Continue reading ›
FEDERAL WAGE LAW: EMPLOYER AGREEMENT FOR OVERTIME
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Managing overtime is a constant struggle for many businesses especially when the employee’s duties necessitate irregular work hours or the typical work shift simply cannot be anticipated with reasonable certainty. Businesses that require on-call services can very easily find themselves paying an excessive amount of overtime to meet the demands of their clients with diminishing…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message