Articles Posted in Employment Law

FORT LAUDERDALE TRADE SECRET LITIGATION: EMPLOYERS MUST ADEQUATELY PROTECT THEIR CONFIDENTIAL TRADE SECRETS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A prevalent issue in Florida trade secret litigation is whether an employer adequately protected its trade secrets and confidential information. To qualify for protection under Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“FUTSA”) and the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”), an employer must show that it adequately maintained the secrecy of its trade secrets and confidential…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FORT LAUDERDALE EMPLOYERS: THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITY ACT DOES NOT MANDATE REASSIGNMENT WITHOUT COMPETITION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination by an employer “against a qualified individual on the basis of disability” in any of the “terms, conditions, and privileges of employment.” 42 U.S.C. § 12112(a). The United States Court of Appeal for the Eleventh Circuit in Holly v. Clairson Industries, L.L.C., 492 F.3d 1247 (11th Cir.…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: ARBITRATION PROVISIONS ARE UNEFORCEABLE WHEN THEY DEFEAT THE PURPOSE OF A REMEDIAL STATUTE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Commercial contracts often contain dispute resolution provisions requiring the contracting parties to resolve all claims arising between them through arbitration. However, arbitration provisions are not automatically valid and enforceable under Florida law. The arbitration provision must provide the potential claimants with the same legal remedies that are otherwise available to them in civil litigation. “Although…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FORT LAUDERDALE EMPLOYERS: EMPLOYMENT LAWSUITS ALLEGING DISCRIMINATION AND HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Employees (current and former) can sue their employers for race and gender discrimination and hostile work environments under the Florida Civil Rights Act (the “FCRA”). The FCRA was patterned after Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employers with more than 15 employees from discriminating “against any individual with respect to…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: WHEN COURTS WILL ISSUE AN INJUNCTION TO PROTECT AN EMPLOYER
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida law sets forth detailed statutory rules governing enforcement of restrictive covenants, commonly known as “non-compete agreements.” Florida Statutes, section 542.335, provides that parties may agree to restrict or prohibit competition in certain circumstances, so long as they protect one or more legitimate business interests and are reasonable in geographic and temporal scope. In determining…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: FORENSIC EXAMINATIONS OF ELECTRONIC DEVICES
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Forensic examinations of cellular phones and other electronic devices are needed when a party willfully withholds relevant information during discovery or where a party is unwilling or unable to search their electronic devices on their own accord. Federal courts can order a party to submit their electronic devices for a forensic examination in business litigation…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: NON-SOLICITATION COVENANTS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

It is critical that Florida employers carefully write their non-compete agreements to ensure they are enforceable and prevent employees from performing the types of activities that the employer needs. Non-compete law in Florida is nuanced and slight deviations in contract wording can sometimes mean the difference between success or failure. Peter Mavrick is a Miami…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: DIVERGENT LEGAL STANDARDS FOR INJUNCTIONS IN STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The decision whether to bring a case in federal court or Florida state court can have significant consequences to the disposition of non-compete litigation. While both federal and Florida will usually apply the same substantive law, the procedure applied differs. This is particularly pertinent in non-compete litigation. Florida courts, when considering whether to enjoin a…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADE SECRET OBTAINED BY IMPROPER MEANS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Misappropriation of a trade secret can occur when there is an acquisition of another’s trade secret by improper means or through disclosure or use of a trade secret without consent by a person who used improper means to acquire the trade secret or knew that the trade secret was improperly acquired. Section 688.002, Florida Statutes.…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: EMPLOYEE’S PERSONAL CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS MAY NOT EXCUSE SOLICITATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Companies often hire experienced sales and business development professionals to expand their business. A non-solicitation provision in an employment contract is intended to prevent post-termination solicitation of clients with whom the business has substantial relationships. When an employee brings clients to a company, it is important to distinguish whether the employee had a prior business…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message