Articles Posted in Non-Compete Agreements

FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: SUBSTANTIAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH CUSTOMERS MUST BE SUFFICIENTLY PROVEN
Mavrick Law Firm Team

For a non-compete agreement to be enforceable, it must be founded on a legitimate business interest which justifies the need for the restraint on competition. A substantial relationship with customers is a common reason asserted to justify the non-compete, however, courts will often examine the exclusivity and nature of the relationship with the customer to…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: WHEN COURTS ARE AUTHORIZED TO REFORM A CONTRACT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A party may seek to reform (change the terms of a contract) a contract when there is erroneous term in the wording of the contract, which was the product of a mutual mistake (made by both parties), a unilateral mistake (made by one party), or inequitable conduct by one party in making the contract. Florida…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: PROOF OF REASONABLE NECESSITY TO ENFORCE A NON-COMPETE COVENANT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

To enforce a non-compete agreement, it is not sufficient to merely show that the scope of the restrictions in the non-compete agreement are reasonable. There must between a connection between the restrictions of the non-compete agreement and the business information. For example, if a business has a legitimate business interest in its product pricing information,…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: INJUNCTIONS AND STATUTORY PRESUMPTION OF IRREPARABLE INJURY
Mavrick Law Firm Team

When a former employer seeks an injunction to enforce a non-compete or non-solicitation agreement, it must prove that it will suffer irreparable harm without entry of an injunction. A party seeking to enforce a non-solicitation provision by injunction does not need to prove that defendant’s specific activities will cause irreparable injury, rather the statute provides…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: COMPILED BUSINESS INFORMATION MAY JUSTIFY A NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Confidential business information may be considered a legitimate business interest justifying enforcement of the non-compete clause. Not all information used by a business will be considered valuable confidential business information by a court, particularly if the information can be obtained through the public domain. However, certain compilations of information, even if public, can be considered…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: SUMMARY JUDGMENT CAN BE INAPPROPRIATE TO DETERMINE REASONABLENESS AND SCOPE OF A NON-COMPETE COVENANT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

In Whitby v. Infinity Radio Inc., 951 So.2d 890 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal decided an appeal from a former employee who had lost on summary judgment in Palm Beach Circuit Court. The trial court had decided in favor of the employer, and against the employee, that the non-compete covenant…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT CLAIMS MUST INCLUDE ALL AFFECTED PARTIES
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A party to a non-compete agreement that was breached by the employer, may preempt its enforcement by seeking a declaratory judgment. To be effective, the declaratory action must include all parties who have a right to enforce the non-compete agreement. “[B]efore any proceeding for declaratory relief is entertained all persons who have an ‘actual, present,…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: RELEASES MUST SUFFICIENTLY REFERENCE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Separation agreements commonly include releases of liability for employers and employees to avoid litigation for any claims that may have been asserted by either party. The presence of a release in the separation agreement does not necessarily relieve the employee of non-compete, non-solicitation, and confidentiality clauses from a prior agreement. Peter Mavrick is a Fort…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: NON-PARTIES AGENTS CAN BE ENJOINED FROM VIOLATING A NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Companies are fictional entities that can only act through their agents. So logically, if a company is bound by a non-compete agreement, then it may also be enforced against the company’s officers. In other words, if a signatory company’s officer opens up a new company for the purpose of competing in a way that violates…

Continue reading ›
PALM BEACH NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS MAY NOT BAR ORDINARY COMPETITION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Non-compete agreements are often drafted with broad provisions to prevent a business’s former employee from competing for its customers for a period of time. To be enforceable non-compete agreements must be based on a legitimate business interest, such as trade secrets, confidential information, and substantial customer relationships. However, a legitimate business interest must be harmed…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message