Articles Posted in Non-Compete Agreements

FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS ARE SUBJECT TO NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS AND A CHANGE IN THEIR EMPLOYMENT STATUS DOES NOT AFFECT THE VALIDITY OF SUCH AGREEMENTS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

There are many important differences between employees and independent contractors that businesses must consider before contracting to hire one or the other. Some of these differences include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Independent contractors are not subject to federal or state labor and employment laws like employees are; 2. The procedure for…

Continue reading ›
NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS CAN BE SUPPORTED BY LEGITIMATE BUSINESS INTERESTS NOT LISTED IN §542.335(B), SUCH AS PROMOTING PRODUCTIVITY AND MAINTAINING COMPETENCE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida’s Non-Competition Covenant Statute, Section 542.335, lays out the requirements for enforceable restrictive covenants. One of the main requirements pursuant to subsection (b) of the statute is that the party seeking to enforce the restrictive covenant must plead and prove the existence of one or more “legitimate business interests” justifying the restrictive covenant. The Miami…

Continue reading ›
“UNCLEAN HANDS” CAN PRECLUDE ENFORCEMENT OF A NON-COMPETE COVENANT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The Mavrick Law Firm regularly represents entrepreneurs who open businesses in industries in which they were formerly employees. As such, often times we are confronted with covenants not to compete signed by the entrepreneur when he or she was employed with his or her former employer. The restrictive covenants will usually restrict the entrepreneur from…

Continue reading ›
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL NON-COMPETE LAW SPLIT RESOLVED: IN HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICE INDUSTRY, REFERRAL SOURCES ARE PROTECTABLE LEGITIMATE BUSINESS INTERESTS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The Mavrick Law Firm’s earlier publication, Florida Non-Compete: Supreme Court To Resolve Conflicting Appellate Court Decisions, examined a conflict between the Fourth District Court of Appeal and the Fifth District Court of Appeal that centered around of the protection of referral sources in the home healthcare industry by Florida’s Non-Compete Statute, § 542.335, Fla. Stat.…

Continue reading ›
NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: BUSINESSES SHOULD INCLUDE THIRD-PARTY ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS IN THEIR NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

All businesses, especially those that may become the target of a merger or acquisition, that want their successor entities or assignees to have the right to enforce non-compete agreements against their former employees should include a provision that allows third-parties to enforce the non-compete agreements. Unless a non-compete agreement expressly authorizes enforcement of the non-compete…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE: SUPREME COURT TO RESOLVE CONFLICTING APPELLATE COURT DECISIONS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The Florida Supreme Court will soon release an opinion that settles whether unidentified prospective patients and referral physicians are protected legitimate business interests within the meaning of Florida’s Non-Compete Statute, § 542.335 Fla. Stat. On March 9, 2017, the Florida Supreme Court heard Oral Arguments in Americare Home Therapy, Inc., Etc. v. Hiles, a medical…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE ENFORCEMENT: EXTRAORDINARY OR SPECIALIZED TRAINING AS A LEGITIMATE BUSINESS INTEREST
Mavrick Law Firm Team

As discussed in prior articles, Florida’s Non-Competition Covenant Statute, § 542.335, permits covenants restraining competition so long as the restrictive covenant meets certain statutory requirements. One of the statutory requirements is that the party seeking to enforce the restrictive covenant must “plead and prove the existence of one or more legitimate business interests justifying the…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: FORMER CUSTOMERS NOT PROTECTED LEGITIMATE BUSINESS INTERESTS UNLESS EXPLICITLY STATED IN THE CONTRACT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

An employer can protect its relationships former clients by establishing that an ongoing business relationship exists with the past client, or by presenting competent and substantial evidence to prove the existence of a substantial relationship within the meaning of § 542.335, Florida Statutes. Under Florida law, the key issue is that the court will view…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE DEFENSE: APPELLATE COURT REVERSES DECISION FOR FAILURE TO APPLY PRESUMPTION OF IRREPARABLE HARM
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida’s Non-Compete Covenant Statute, section 542.335, establishes certain requirements for covenants restraining competition, and once such statutory requirements are met, the restrictive covenant becomes enforceable. Section 542.335(1)(j) allows restrictive covenants to be enforced through a temporary injunction, which, pursuant to Rule 1.610(a)(1)(A) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, may be granted only if “it…

Continue reading ›
Are non-compete agreements always enforceable?
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Non-compete agreements are not always enforceable. Florida typically requires that all competition be allowed, and there shall be no restriction of competition, but there’s a separate statute in Florida, which is 542.335 Florida statutes that governs non-compete agreements. That statute requires that there be certain legitimate business interests of the employer set out in the…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message