Articles Posted in Non-Compete Agreements

FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: EMPLOYEE’S PERSONAL CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS MAY NOT EXCUSE SOLICITATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Companies often hire experienced sales and business development professionals to expand their business. A non-solicitation provision in an employment contract is intended to prevent post-termination solicitation of clients with whom the business has substantial relationships. When an employee brings clients to a company, it is important to distinguish whether the employee had a prior business…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: COURTS INTERPRET CONTRACTS TO AVOID ABSURD RESULTS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

When the wording of a contractual provision is confusing or ambiguous, courts must interpret the contract in a rational manner. Some examples of vague contractual provisions include, “during business hours” and time frames with no clear anchor date, i.e. “within six months of commencement.” The courts generally agree that where one interpretation of a contract…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: ALLEGATIONS OF ILLEGAL CONDUCT AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS (PART II)
Mavrick Law Firm Team

This article is the second of a two-part series concerning the enforcement of noncompete agreements when the former employee claims that his former employer engaged in illegal conduct. Part I explored the enforceability of contracts which contain illegal terms. This, Part II, addresses how allegations of illegal conduct can affect noncompete agreements particularly. As shown…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: ILLEGAL CONDUCT AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS (PART I)
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Former employees who are accused of breaching their noncompete agreements with their former employer sometimes try to claim that the former employer engaged in illegal conduct, and thus, a noncompete agreement cannot be enforced. While there are certain types of unlawful conduct which a court may cite to justify the denial of request for a…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: EMPLOYEE’S MILITARY SERVICE MAY NOT TOLL NON-COMPETE PERIOD
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A non-compete period may not be tolled because an employee is called for active military duty. While an employee may not be denied reemployment on account of a person’s performance of military duty, under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, 38 U.S.C. § 4311, a court may consider the fact that…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: JUDGMENTS INCORPORATING ILLEGAL NON-COMPETES MAY BE ENFORCEABLE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Section 542.335 of the Florida Statutes permits non-compete agreements arising from: a) the sale of a business, b) an employment, agency, or independent contractor relationship, c) a licensing relationship, or d) a partnership. Contracts that restrain one from exercising a lawful profession, trade, or business, and that do not fall within the exceptions of the…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE TRADE SECRET LAW: CONFIDENTIALITY AND NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS PROTECT TRADE SECRETS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Businesses in highly competitive industries often create and maintain highly confidential business information and trade secrets. Businesses spend substantial amounts of money curating this confidential information. To protect this investment, businesses must take steps to ensure the continued secrecy of its confidential information, such as limiting access and requiring employees with access to sign confidentiality…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: ORAL EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT DOES NOT SATISFY STATUTE OF FRAUDS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Pursuant to Section 542.335, Florida Statutes, a non-compete agreement must be in a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. Businesses often enter agreements with their employees for specified period with an option to renew. Courts have found that written agreements can be extended beyond their expiration dates when the parties agree…

Continue reading ›
BOCA RATON NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: RESTRUCTURING SERVICES MAY NOT CONSTITUTE BEING OUT OF THE “LINE OF BUSINESS”
Mavrick Law Firm Team

When a party to a non-compete agreement no longer provides services in that particular “line of business,” they may no longer have a legitimate business interest preventing the other party from competing. However, discontinuance from servicing a specific demographic of customers does not necessary constitute the fact that a party may no longer offer services…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: COURTS MAY INTERPRET NON-COMPETE ARBITRATION PROVISIONS TO APPLY TO PURCHASE AGREEMENTS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

When a business is purchased, often the former owner will enter into a separate employment agreement to provide continuity of service to the customers and a smooth transition from the former owner to the new one. Such agreements typically include a non-compete provision so that the former owner does not attempt to take the customers…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message