Articles Posted in Non-Compete Agreements

MIAMI NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: JUDGMENTS INCORPORATING ILLEGAL NON-COMPETES MAY BE ENFORCEABLE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Section 542.335 of the Florida Statutes permits non-compete agreements arising from: a) the sale of a business, b) an employment, agency, or independent contractor relationship, c) a licensing relationship, or d) a partnership. Contracts that restrain one from exercising a lawful profession, trade, or business, and that do not fall within the exceptions of the…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE TRADE SECRET LAW: CONFIDENTIALITY AND NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS PROTECT TRADE SECRETS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Businesses in highly competitive industries often create and maintain highly confidential business information and trade secrets. Businesses spend substantial amounts of money curating this confidential information. To protect this investment, businesses must take steps to ensure the continued secrecy of its confidential information, such as limiting access and requiring employees with access to sign confidentiality…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: ORAL EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT DOES NOT SATISFY STATUTE OF FRAUDS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Pursuant to Section 542.335, Florida Statutes, a non-compete agreement must be in a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. Businesses often enter agreements with their employees for specified period with an option to renew. Courts have found that written agreements can be extended beyond their expiration dates when the parties agree…

Continue reading ›
BOCA RATON NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: RESTRUCTURING SERVICES MAY NOT CONSTITUTE BEING OUT OF THE “LINE OF BUSINESS”
Mavrick Law Firm Team

When a party to a non-compete agreement no longer provides services in that particular “line of business,” they may no longer have a legitimate business interest preventing the other party from competing. However, discontinuance from servicing a specific demographic of customers does not necessary constitute the fact that a party may no longer offer services…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: COURTS MAY INTERPRET NON-COMPETE ARBITRATION PROVISIONS TO APPLY TO PURCHASE AGREEMENTS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

When a business is purchased, often the former owner will enter into a separate employment agreement to provide continuity of service to the customers and a smooth transition from the former owner to the new one. Such agreements typically include a non-compete provision so that the former owner does not attempt to take the customers…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS OF A DISSOLVED CORPORATION MAY NOT BE ENFORCEABLE BY A SUCCESSOR
Mavrick Law Firm Team

When a company purchases the assets of another company, the circumstances in which the sale takes place could impact the enforceability of the seller’s non-compete agreements with its employees. For example, a 100 percent stock purchase of an active corporation will generally entitle the buyer to enforce the seller’s non-compete agreements. However, if the buyer…

Continue reading ›
PALM BEACH NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: TEMPORARY INJUNCTION TO STOP “IRREPARABLE HARM”
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Businesses seeking to enforce their non-compete agreements often need to seek a temporary injunction to prevent irreparable harm. Non-compete law is unique because the moving party does not need to provide evidence quantifying the amount of possible damages in order to show irreparable harm. Under Florida law, the business instead needs to allege that immeasurable…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT DISPUTE MAY REQUIRE ARBITRATION OF A NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Businesses often execute non-compete agreements separate from but contemporaneously with an employment agreement. When the employment agreement contains an arbitration provision, but the non-compete agreement does not, parties can dispute whether the non-compete agreement is arbitrable. Further, it becomes more complicated if the non-compete agreement contains wording that suggests that disputes must be litigated in…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: FLORIDA LAW VERSUS MARYLAND LAW
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida and Maryland’s non-compete laws are protective of business interests in customer relationships and goodwill. Due to the advent of remote working capabilities, there are often cases when the non-compete laws of more than one state may be implicated. For example, a Florida employee may work in Florida for a company based in Maryland, and…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: SUBSTANTIAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH CUSTOMERS MUST BE SUFFICIENTLY PROVEN
Mavrick Law Firm Team

For a non-compete agreement to be enforceable, it must be founded on a legitimate business interest which justifies the need for the restraint on competition. A substantial relationship with customers is a common reason asserted to justify the non-compete, however, courts will often examine the exclusivity and nature of the relationship with the customer to…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message