Articles Posted in Non-Compete Cases

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: ASSIGNING NON-COMPETE PROVISIONS
Mavrick Law Firm

A business purchaser often requires the seller to sign a non-compete provision as part of the sale. Purchasers usually require non-compete provisions to prevent the business seller from starting a new rival business that deprives the purchaser of the value of the assert he or she purchased. The same logic applies to the business’s employees.…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: RESTRICTIVE COVENANT DURATIONS
Mavrick Law Firm

            Businesses often rely on restrictive covenants to protect their sensitive business information and to protect themselves from unfair competition. Businesses often require employees to sign non-compete agreements and employee confidentiality agreements to accomplish these goals. Businesses also often include similar provisions when they purchase all or part of another business. A purchaser will include…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: UNUSUAL BUSINESS DISPUTE DEFENSES
Mavrick Law Firm

The defenses of unclean hands and in pari delicto are useful in commercial and business disputes.  These are similar defenses that arise when the party bringing the lawsuit possesses a level of fault or guilt. Unclean hands and in pari delicto can be applied in business disputes under certain circumstances to prevent an actor from…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: NON-COMPETE BAN IN APPELLATE COURT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The Federal Trade Commission’s rule banning most non-compete agreements is now before a federal appellate court. On May 7, 2024, the FTC proposed a rule that would have banned most non-compete agreements. This rule would have substantially impacted many businesses because non-compete agreements are used to prohibit employees from using the company’s information to compete…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: DOCTRINES OF RES JUDICATA AND COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL
Mavrick Law Firm

A lawsuit is generally considered over once a litigant obtains judgment in its favor assuming no appeal is taken and no post-judgment collection issues exist. However, the losing party is often left unsatisfied. Therefore, the loser may try to “re-do” the lawsuit by suing the defendant again using slightly different claims or lodging the lawsuit…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE LITIGATION: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD PROHIBITS NON-COMPETE
Mavrick Law Firm

Non-compete agreements have received significant attention this year after the Federal Trade Commission issued a rule on April 23, 2024, banning most employee non-compete agreements. The rule was scheduled to go into effect on September 4, 2024. However, on August 20, 2024, a court in the United States District Court for the Northern District of…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: LEGALITY OF GEOGRAPHIC AREA IN NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
Mavrick Law Firm

Businesses commonly enter into restrictive covenants with their employees to prohibit them from unfairly competing with the business during and after employment. Restrictive covenants include contracts that restrict competition, such as non-compete agreements, non-disclosure agreements, and confidentiality agreements. When preparing a restrictive covenant, what provisions should be included? Typically, a business should include provisions that…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: FTC CANNOT ENFORCE RULE AGAINST NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
Mavrick Law Firm

Non-compete agreements have been a standard business practice for many years. Businesses use non-compete agreements to protect their interests like proprietary business information, trade secrets, customer, goodwill, staff, and others. However, on April 23, 2024, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) upended this long-standing business practice by issuing a rule banning most non-compete agreements. See 16…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS AND “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION”
Mavrick Law Firm

Under Florida law, enforcement of a non-compete agreement requires requires proof of at least one “legitimate business interest.” Fla. Stat. § 542.335 (“The person seeking enforcement of a restrictive covenant shall plead and prove the existence of one or more legitimate business interests justifying the restrictive covenant.”). A failure to plead or prove the existence…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: AMBIGUOUS CONTRACT AND PAROL EVIDENCE
Mavrick Law Firm

The parol evidence rule is a substantive rule of law that limits the introduction of evidence to interpret the meaning of a contractual provision. King v. Bray, 867 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (“The parol-evidence rule is a substantive rule of law and… provides that a written document intended by the parties to…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message