Articles Posted in Non-Compete Law

FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: LEGITIMATE BUSINESS INTERESTS CAN BE ESTABLISHED BY CLIENT GOODWILL ASSOCIATED WITH A SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A temporary injunction is an available remedy when a party establishes that it has a valid, enforceable non-compete agreement that was violated. Fla. Stat. § 542.335(1)(j). Subsections 542.335(1)(b) and (c) of the Florida Statutes, set the standard for enforcing non-compete agreements and require the party seeking enforcement to plead and prove: (1) the existence of…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES IN NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS MAY BE ENFORCED UNLESS THEY CAN BE SHOWN TO BE UNREASONABLE OR UNJUST
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A forum-selection clause is a structural provision of a contract that addresses the procedural requirements for dispute resolution. In other words, the contracting parties may choose which forum, i.e. which federal or state court, for prospective disputes to be filed. Courts must enforce forum-selection agreements unless they are shown to be unreasonable or unjust. Peter…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: COURTS REQUIRE PROOF OF PARTICULAR FACTS TO ESTABLISH A LEGITIMATE BUSINESS INTEREST FOR A NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Any competition by a former employee may injure the business of the former employer. However, the former employer cannot restrain ordinary competition. To be entitled to protection, the former employer must show special facts over and above ordinary competition which show that the former employee would have an unfair advantage without the non-compete agreement. Peter…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LITIGATION: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS ABOUT NON-COMPETE NEGOTIATIONS MAY BE SUBJECT TO DISCLOSURE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

When disputes arise over which version of a non-compete agreement was the final version executed by and binding on the parties, discovery of pre-contract negotiations may become necessary. Parties often retain an attorney for those negotiations. If the attorney involved in the negotiations becomes a witness to the case, attorney-client communications may need to be…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: NON-COMPETE PERIODS MAY NOT BE EXTENDED UNLESS THERE IS AN EQUITABLE REASON
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Non-compete provisions in employment contracts are not prohibited so long as such contracts are reasonable in time, area, and line of business. In any action concerning enforcement of a non-compete provision the court considers the terms of the contract as agreed to by the parties. If the non-compete period has expired, a court may not…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NONCOMPETE AGREEMENTS: STIPULATIONS TO IRREPARABLE INJURY IN NON-COMPETE CONTRACTS MAY NOT BE ENFORCEABLE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

It has long been recognized that before injunctive relief can be granted a movant must show irreparable injury. Langford v. Rotech Oxygen & Medical Equipment, Inc., 541 So.2d 1267 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Many non-compete contracts will contain a provision that stipulates that a violation of the restrictive covenant not to compete would create an…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: COURTS SCRUTINIZE THE CONTRACTUAL WORDING WHEN DECIDING THE SCOPE OF A NON-COMPETE COVENANT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A party seeking a temporary injunction to enforce a non-compete agreement must establish four elements: (1) a likelihood of irreparable harm and the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law; (2) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (3) the threatened injury to the petitioner outweighs any possible harm to the respondent, and (4)…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: ADVERTISING BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION MAY NOT VIOLATE A NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida’s Non-Competition Covenant Statute, § 542.335, permits agreements that restrain competition so long as the agreement meets certain statutory requirements. One of the statutory requirements is that the party seeking to enforce the non-compete agreement must “plead and prove the existence of one or more legitimate business interests justifying the restrictive covenant.” § 542.335(1)(b), Florida…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: ANTITRUST ISSUES WHEN EMPLOYERS AGREE NOT TO SOLICT EACH OTHER’S EMPLOYEES
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Many employers possess confidential information vital to generating profits. Employers routinely entrust employees with this information to facilitate business operations, but employees often leave their job after a few years to work for a competitor. When this happens, the employee takes the confidential information he or she learned to the next job. The employee might…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AND RELATED TORT LAW: WHEN DO AN EMPLOYEE’S ACTIONS BEFORE ENDING EMPLOYMENT CONSTITUTE TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE AS OPPOSED TO LAWFUL PREPARATION TO COMPETE?
Mavrick Law Firm Team

It is well settled in Florida law that “an employee does not violate his duty of loyalty when he merely organizes a corporation during his employment to carry on a rival business after the expiration of his employment.” Fish v. Adams, 401 So.2d 843 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Absent a non-compete agreement, a former employee…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message