Articles Posted in Trademark Infringement Litigation

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT AND UNAUTHORIZED “USE”
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Under federal law, trademark infringement is proscribed by 15 U.S. C. § 1114(1)(a), which prohibits any person from the “use in commerce [of] any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribution, or advertising of any goods or services on or in connection with…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADE DRESS INFRINGEMENT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Under federal law, the term “trade dress” involves the total image of a product and may include features such as size, shape, color or color combinations, texture, graphics, or even particular sales techniques. For example, “[t]he design or packaging of a product may acquire a distinctiveness which serves to identify the product with its manufacturer…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT AND LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A company that successfully has its mark registered with the USPTO does not have immunity from other trademark owners claiming infringement. A trademark owner with a higher priority may nevertheless sue under the Lanham act if it can show that there is a “likelihood of confusion” between the two marks. Peter Mavrick is a Miami…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADEMARK PROTECTION FOR DISTINCT TRADE NAME
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida businesses seeking to protect their reputation may need to bring a lawsuit under the Lanham Act to protect their trademarks. Defendants in business litigation asserting trademark infringement sometimes defend on the grounds that the plaintiff’s trademark is “generic” and therefore cannot be protected under the Lanham Act. A recent case from the United States…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: RECENT SUPREME COURT DECISION ON “GENERIC” TRADEMARKS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Effective protection of a Florida business’ trademark rights can be critical to the success of the business. Trademark protection can help a Florida business establish a reputation and prevent imitators from taking advantage of that reputation. A recent United States Supreme Court business litigation case held which types of generic marks can be registered with…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: CLAIMS FOR LOST PROFITS BASED ON UNINTENTIONAL TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The judicial remedies for victims of trademark infringement vary depending upon the intentions of the infringer. A Florida business which has been victimized by a malicious counterfeiter can seek lost profits, treble damages, attorneys’ fees, and other remedies. By contrast, a company which accidentally violated trademark law has significantly less exposure. A recent United States…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT AND UNFAIR COMPETITION LITIGATION: RECENT FEDERAL COURT PRECEDENT PERMITS TRADEMARK OWNERS TO SUE LANDLORDS FOR THEIR TENANTS’ VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A trademark owner can of course sue the business selling counterfeit copies of the trademark owner’s goods, but it may also sue other businesses that sufficiently provide products or services which the counterfeiter uses. In Luxottica Group, S.p.A. v. Airport Mini Mall, LLC, 932 F.3d 1303 (2019), the United States Court of Appeals for the…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION: “LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION” MUST BE ESTABLISHED IN A COUNTERFEIT CLAIM WHERE MARKS ARE NOT “SUBSTANTIALLY INDISTINGUISHABLE”
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Under the Lanham Act, a defendant may be liable for trademark infringement, if, without consent, he/she uses “in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark” which “is likely to cause confusion or to cause mistake, or to deceive.” 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1). The Act defines a “counterfeit” as a “spurious…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION: ACCOUNTING OF DEFENDANT’S PROFITS DEPENDS ON A SHOWING OF WILLFULL INFRINGEMENT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The Lanham Act provides that a successful plaintiff may recover: (1) defendant’s profits, (2) any damages sustained by the plaintiff, and (3) costs of the action. 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a). In exceptional cases, a district court may award attorney fees to the prevailing party. The Lanham Act gives broad discretion to the district court to…

Continue reading ›
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION: PRODUCT DESIGNS THAT ARE FUNCTIONAL MAY NOT BE SUBJECT TO TRADE DRESS PROTECTION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The term ‘trade dress’ refers to the appearance of a product when that appearance is used to identify the creator of that product. Trade dress encompasses the total image of a product and may include features such as size, shape, color, texture, graphics, or particular sales techniques.” AmBrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message