Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: DUTY OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Under Florida law, every contract has a duty of good faith and fair dealing. A party to a contract generally cannot subvert the very purpose of a contract through an improper exercise of its discretion. A party does not violate the duty of good faith and fair dealing, however, when the parties expressly contemplated the…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: FLORIDA LAW VERSUS MARYLAND LAW
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida and Maryland’s non-compete laws are protective of business interests in customer relationships and goodwill. Due to the advent of remote working capabilities, there are often cases when the non-compete laws of more than one state may be implicated. For example, a Florida employee may work in Florida for a company based in Maryland, and…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FORT LAUDERDALE EMPLOYERS: EEOC LEGAL DEADLINES
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Employee-plaintiffs face strict deadlines when bringing discrimination claims. The 90-day deadline to file a lawsuit filing receipt of a right-to-sue letter from the EEOC can sometimes be extended if the receipt of the letter was delayed. A recent case before the United States Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals explained that these time extensions will not…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADEMARK PROTECTION FOR DISTINCT TRADE NAME
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida businesses seeking to protect their reputation may need to bring a lawsuit under the Lanham Act to protect their trademarks. Defendants in business litigation asserting trademark infringement sometimes defend on the grounds that the plaintiff’s trademark is “generic” and therefore cannot be protected under the Lanham Act. A recent case from the United States…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: TRADE SECRET ACT PREEMPTION OF CLAIMS UNDER THE FLORIDA DECEPTIVE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES ACT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Plaintiffs may be tempted to bring as many causes of action into a legal complaint that the facts may allow. Diversity of causes of action in business litigation can provide the plaintiff with different types of remedies and help a suit endure should a legal defect arise concerning any particular cause of action. However, cases…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: SUBSTANTIAL RELATIONSHIPS WITH CUSTOMERS MUST BE SUFFICIENTLY PROVEN
Mavrick Law Firm Team

For a non-compete agreement to be enforceable, it must be founded on a legitimate business interest which justifies the need for the restraint on competition. A substantial relationship with customers is a common reason asserted to justify the non-compete, however, courts will often examine the exclusivity and nature of the relationship with the customer to…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FORT LAUDERDALE EMPLOYERS: DEFEATING CLAIMS OF RETALIATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

An employee can make a claim of unlawful retaliation under federal and Florida anti-discrimination law when he or she complains about racial discrimination, and then is subsequently passed over for a promotion. Actually proving such a claim, however, can be extremely difficult for the employee when the employer expresses a non-discriminatory reason for refusing to…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: PROOF OF INTENT WHEN CLAIMING FRAUD
Mavrick Law Firm Team

An aggrieved party to a contract will sometimes claim that they were fraudulently induced into entering the contract. These types of claims may often be difficult to prove. A plaintiff cannot prevail on a fraudulent inducement claim by simply showing that he or she was deceived. A plaintiff must also show evidence of a defendant’s…

Continue reading ›
MIAMI BUSINESS LITIGATION: AMBIGUOUS CONTRACTS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Businesses involved in breach of contract cases will often dispute the meaning of contract terms. A contract that may seem clear pre-dispute can often be interpreted differently after a dispute has arisen. Litigation concerning whether a disputed contract term is ambiguous can be critical in how a case will ultimately be decided. A business that…

Continue reading ›
FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: EFFECTIVE LEGAL REPRESENTATION AFTER CHANGE OF THE PRESIDING JUDGE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

An issue that can occur in business litigation is that the judge presiding over a lawsuit may be reassigned, retire or pass away. If that occurs, a successor judge will be appointed and he or she will take over the case. This can present a significant issue when a party seeks for the court to…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message