Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: FRANCHISORS MAY HAVE A LEGITIMATE BUSINESS INTEREST IN RE-ENTERING MARKET SERVED BY TERMINATED FORMER FRANCHISEE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Franchisors will often include non-compete provisions in their Franchise Agreements to protect their ability to sell new franchises in a geographic region that was formerly served by a terminated franchisee. A party seeking to enforce a non-compete agreement must plead and prove the existence of one or more legitimate business interests justifying the non-compete covenant…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: ORDINARY COMPETITION MAY NOT CONSTITUTE A TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE CLAIM
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Tortious interference is the intentional and unjustified interference with a relationship or contract that results in damages. However, tortious interference does not occur every time a contract or business relationship is consequentially affected. Direct interference is a necessary element of the tort (a wrongful act or an infringement of a right). Peter Mavrick is a…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: SEXUAL HARASSMENT CLAIMS DEPEND ON THE SEVERITY AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE HARASSMENT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

To qualify as sexual harassment under Florida and Federal antidiscrimination laws, sexual conduct between employees must be so severe and pervasive that it alters the “terms and conditions” of employment. While it may be prudent for an employer to discourage sexual relationships between supervisors and employees, the mere fact that an employee has been the…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LAW: WITHOUT A NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT, AN INJUNCTION PROHIBITING USE OF TRADE SECRETS MAY NOT ENJOIN COMPETITION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“FUTSA”) requires courts to take reasonable steps to preserve the secrecy of trade secrets. Fla. Stat. § 688.006. Injunctive relief may be ordered to preserve trade secrets based on actual or threatened misappropriation, as well as, compelling parties to perform specific acts. Fla. Stat. § 688.003. FUTSA, however, may…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: ARBITRATION PROVISIONS AND THEIR SCOPE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Under Florida and federal law, whether a legal dispute is subject to the requirement that the parties submit to arbitration (what courts refer to as the “arbitrability” of the dispute) depends on what the wording of the arbitration agreement itself states. The parties’ intent as to what issues are to be arbitrated is typically evident…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: UNDEFINED TERMS IN NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS MAY LIMIT THE PROTECTION AFFORDED BY THE CONTRACT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

An undefined term in a non-compete agreement creates an ambiguity in the contract, and therefore uncertainty in a court’s interpretation of the term. When a term is left undefined, Florida law requires courts to give the term its ordinary meaning. Although the terms “compete” and “line of business” may seem self-explanatory, the context in which…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: DEFEATING BAD FAITH CLAIMS OF RETALIATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Certain types of employee complaints to an employer qualify as “protected activity.” An employer that responds to a protected complaint by terminating, demoting, or otherwise taking an adverse employment action against the employee risks being sued for retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or the Florida Civil Rights Act of…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADE SECRET AND NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT LITIGATION: TRADE SECRETS MUST BE CLOSELY GUARDED TO BE PROTECTABLE UNDER FLORIDA AND FEDERAL LAW
Mavrick Law Firm Team

For a business to be to protect its confidential information as a protectable trade secrets under the Florida Uniform Trade Secret Act, the business must preserve the secrecy of its confidential information. There are no hard and fast rules that must be followed for a business to protect its confidential information as a trade secret.…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: CORPORATE OWNERSHIP WHEN NO STOCK CERTIFICATES WERE ISSUED
Mavrick Law Firm Team

It is a fundamental premise that ownership of a corporation is evidenced by stock certificates. However, this is not always the case with small, closely held corporations that do not sell stock on a market. Sometimes those corporations do not issue certificates. To accommodate that realty, Florida law allows for the equitable or beneficial ownership…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LITIGATION: TRADE SECRET INJUNCTIONS MUST BE SPECIFIC ENOUGH FOR AN ORDINARY PERSON TO UNDERSTAND
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Protection of trade secrets and proprietary information from a business’ competitors can be a critical part of owning a company. An injunction may become necessary to stop a competing company from possessing or using those trade secrets for their own benefit. The injunction, however, must be specific enough for the enjoined party to understand what…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message