Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: RESTRICTION ON DOCTORS SEEING PATIENTS WITHIN A SPECIFIC COUNTY MAY BE ENFORCEABLE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Contracts that restrict or prohibit competition during or after the term of employment are enforceable, “so long as such contracts are reasonable in time, area, and line of business…” Florida Statute § 542.335. A non-compete provision that prohibits a doctor from seeing any patients from medical practice that formerly employed him/her, is not overbroad, provided…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION, PART TWO: CONTRACTUAL “INTEGRATION” OR “MERGER” CLAUSES CAN REDUCE UNCERTAINTY IN BREACH OF CONTRACT LAWSUITS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

This article is the second in a two-part series on contractual “merger” or “integration” clauses (the terms merger and integration are used interchangeably). Integration/merger clauses purport to define a contract as being limited to only what is contained in the written document signed by the parties. This can help ensure that neither party will later…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: OTHER STATES MAY REFUSE TO ENFORCE FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida employers that seek to enforce Florida non-compete agreements outside the state of Florida cannot presume that out-of-state courts will enforce the agreement as that agreement would have been enforced in Florida. Florida’s non-compete law, § 542.335, Florida Statutes, is considered by many to be the most “pro-employer” in the nation. Other states may refuse…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION, PART ONE: CONTRACTUAL “INTEGRATION” OR “MERGER” CLAUSES CAN REDUCE UNCERTAINTY IN BREACH OF CONTRACT LAWSUITS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

This article is part one in a two-part series of articles on contractual “merger” or “integration” clauses, which purport to limit the terms of a contract to the terms contained in the written document signed by the parties. This can help ensure that neither party will later claim that he was promised something as part…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: PUBLIC POLICY RARELY AFFECTS FLORIDA COURTS’ ANALYSIS OF WHETHER TO ENFORCE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Generally, a non-compete agreement is enforceable if it is in writing, supports an employer’s legitimate business interest, and is not overly restrictive in its duration and geographical area. See Florida Statute § 542.335. The Florida Statute governing non-compete agreements lists several public policy considerations that appear, at first blush, to be an impediment to the…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: “LEGITIMATE BUSINESS INTERESTS” NOT ARTICULATED UNDER THE NON-COMPETE STATUTE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Agreements in restraints of trade are generally void unless they comply with the procedures of § 542.335, Florida Statutes. The statute requires that any agreement restraining trade, such as a non-compete or non-solicitation agreement, be supported by a “legitimate business interest.” An agreement restraining trade can only be enforced to the extent that the agreement…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: FORMING RELATIONSHIPS WITH CUSTOMERS AS PART OF A SALES POSITION MAY BE A PROTECTED BUSINESS INTEREST
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Many sales positions, irrespective of the industry, require employees to establish personal relationships with prospective or existing customers. Sales employees often meet and greet a business’ existing and potential customers, at the business’ expense to ensure current and future business success. These substantial relationships formed by employees may constitute a protected legitimate business interests as…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: NON-CONSUMER LAWSUITS UNDER FLORIDA’S DECEPTIVE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES ACT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (“FDUTPA”), § 501.201 et seq, Florida Statutes, allows a person to sue a business for unfair competition and deceptive or unconscionable business practices. Although the statute allows a consumer to sue a business for violations of FDUTPA, Florida appellate court decisions have also allowed some businesses to sue…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LITIGATION: THE MEANING OF THE TERM “INDEPENDENT ECONOMIC VALUE”
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Florida law can protect companies when their trade secrets are stolen. For such protections to apply, the confidential information at issue must qualify as a “trade secret” as defined by the Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“FUTSA”). Fla. Stat. 688.001, et seq. Generally, something can be a trade secret if derives “independent economic value from…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: FLORIDA’S REVISED ARBITRATION CODE ALLOWS PARTIES TO SEEK PROVISIONAL REMEDIES EVEN WHEN THEY CONTRACTUALLY AGREED TO ARBITRATE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The Florida Arbitration Code provides businesses with flexibility in resolving their conflicts through arbitration. Arbitration is an immensely popular method of conflict resolution for Florida business litigation and employment litigation. Arbitration can generally help resolve disputes more quickly than litigation. However, parties to arbitration sometimes need court intervention via “provisional remedies,” i.e., a court ruling…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message