Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: FLORIDA LEGISLATURE NARROWED THE APPLICATION OF NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS FOR CERTAIN SPECIALTY PHYSICIANS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The Florida Legislature has enacted a new statute impacting non-compete agreements for certain specialty physicians, effective June 25, 2019. Pursuant to Florida Statute § 542.336, there is no “legitimate business interest” to support non-compete agreements for physicians licensed under Chapter 458 and 459 of the Florida Statutes, where there is only one entity that employs…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT AND UNFAIR COMPETITION LITIGATION: RECENT FEDERAL COURT PRECEDENT PERMITS TRADEMARK OWNERS TO SUE LANDLORDS FOR THEIR TENANTS’ VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A trademark owner can of course sue the business selling counterfeit copies of the trademark owner’s goods, but it may also sue other businesses that sufficiently provide products or services which the counterfeiter uses. In Luxottica Group, S.p.A. v. Airport Mini Mall, LLC, 932 F.3d 1303 (2019), the United States Court of Appeals for the…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: CHANGES IN FEDERAL APPELLATE COURT INTERPRETATIONS OF WHAT IS CONSIDERED SEX DISCRIMINATION UNDER FEDERAL LAW
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Any employee claiming illegal sex discrimination must show that an employer took an adverse employment action, such as hiring, firing, promoting, or discipling an employee, and that action was motivated by the sex of the employee. Avoiding sex discrimination claims is complicated by the fact that the definition of “sex” as it is understood in…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA EMPLOYMENT AND NONCOMPETE LITIGATION: EMPLOYERS SHOULD CAREFULLY DRAFT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS TO AVOID FURTHER LITIGATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Employers in litigation against their employees face the challenge of not only dealing with the claims made by those employees, but the threat of being left to pay the attorneys’ fees bill of their opponents. Employers can mitigate that risk, and sometimes even turn the tables and win their attorneys’ fees from their former employees,…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: EQUITABLE ESTOPPEL ONLY PERMITS A NON-SIGNATORIES TO COMPEL ARBITRATION UNDER AN AGREEMENT IN LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Equitable estoppel is a legal doctrine that essentially prevents one party from taking unfair advantage of another party. Equitable estoppel allows a non-signatory to a contract to compel arbitration of a signatory’s claims against them, if the signatory raised allegations of concerted misconduct by both the non-signatory and one or more of the signatories to…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: LEGITIMATE BUSINESS INTERESTS CAN BE ESTABLISHED BY CLIENT GOODWILL ASSOCIATED WITH A SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A temporary injunction is an available remedy when a party establishes that it has a valid, enforceable non-compete agreement that was violated. Fla. Stat. § 542.335(1)(j). Subsections 542.335(1)(b) and (c) of the Florida Statutes, set the standard for enforcing non-compete agreements and require the party seeking enforcement to plead and prove: (1) the existence of…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS ACCUSED OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT: ISOLATED INCIDENTS OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT ARE RARELY VIABLE CLAIMS UNDER TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT AND THE FLORIDA CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

An aggrieved employee suing his or her employer for “sexual harassment” must present evidence that his workplace is such a hostile and abusive work environment because of his or her sex that it alters the conditions of his employment. An aggrieved employee does not make an actionable claim if he or she has suffered only…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES IN NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS MAY BE ENFORCED UNLESS THEY CAN BE SHOWN TO BE UNREASONABLE OR UNJUST
Mavrick Law Firm Team

A forum-selection clause is a structural provision of a contract that addresses the procedural requirements for dispute resolution. In other words, the contracting parties may choose which forum, i.e. which federal or state court, for prospective disputes to be filed. Courts must enforce forum-selection agreements unless they are shown to be unreasonable or unjust. Peter…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION: “LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION” MUST BE ESTABLISHED IN A COUNTERFEIT CLAIM WHERE MARKS ARE NOT “SUBSTANTIALLY INDISTINGUISHABLE”
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Under the Lanham Act, a defendant may be liable for trademark infringement, if, without consent, he/she uses “in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark” which “is likely to cause confusion or to cause mistake, or to deceive.” 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1). The Act defines a “counterfeit” as a “spurious…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LAW: COURTS REQUIRE PROOF OF PARTICULAR FACTS TO ESTABLISH A LEGITIMATE BUSINESS INTEREST FOR A NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Any competition by a former employee may injure the business of the former employer. However, the former employer cannot restrain ordinary competition. To be entitled to protection, the former employer must show special facts over and above ordinary competition which show that the former employee would have an unfair advantage without the non-compete agreement. Peter…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message