Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog

FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LITIGATION: COURTS SCRUTINIZE TRADE SECRET INFORMATION WHEN RULING ON PROTECTIVE ORDERS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Protection of trade secrets and proprietary information is critical when a business receives a subpoena for its business information and documents. Even when a business is not a party to a lawsuit, it can be compelled to produce sensitive information that can cause irreparable harm. It is often necessary to seek an order of protection…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE LITIGATION: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS ABOUT NON-COMPETE NEGOTIATIONS MAY BE SUBJECT TO DISCLOSURE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

When disputes arise over which version of a non-compete agreement was the final version executed by and binding on the parties, discovery of pre-contract negotiations may become necessary. Parties often retain an attorney for those negotiations. If the attorney involved in the negotiations becomes a witness to the case, attorney-client communications may need to be…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: FEDERAL APPELLATE COURT AFFIRMS DISMISSAL OF RACE DISCRIMINATION LAWSUIT BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE FAILED TO LOGICALLY PROVE DISCRIMINATION
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Employers in Florida are free to use all lawful criteria in deciding which employees to promote within the business. It is well known that Florida and federal law prohibit employment discrimination based on various characteristics, such as race, age, national origin, sex, or religious affiliation. When considering employment discrimination lawsuits, Florida and federal courts have…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS: NON-COMPETE PERIODS MAY NOT BE EXTENDED UNLESS THERE IS AN EQUITABLE REASON
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Non-compete provisions in employment contracts are not prohibited so long as such contracts are reasonable in time, area, and line of business. In any action concerning enforcement of a non-compete provision the court considers the terms of the contract as agreed to by the parties. If the non-compete period has expired, a court may not…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADE SECRET LAW: COURTS SCRUTINIZE TRADE SECRET INFORMATION WHEN CONSIDERING PROTECTIVE ORDERS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Protection of trade secrets and proprietary information is critical, when a business receives a subpoena for their business information and documents. Even when a business is not a party to a lawsuit, it can be compelled to produce sensitive information that can cause irreparable harm. It is often necessary to seek an order of protection…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT LITIGATION: ACCOUNTING OF DEFENDANT’S PROFITS DEPENDS ON A SHOWING OF WILLFULL INFRINGEMENT
Mavrick Law Firm Team

The Lanham Act provides that a successful plaintiff may recover: (1) defendant’s profits, (2) any damages sustained by the plaintiff, and (3) costs of the action. 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a). In exceptional cases, a district court may award attorney fees to the prevailing party. The Lanham Act gives broad discretion to the district court to…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NON-COMPETE CONTRACTS MAY NOT BIND SUCCESSOR COMPANIES UNLESS THE AGREEMENT IS ASSIGNABLE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

When businesses are sold, the non-compete agreements the seller may have entered with its employees are likely to be assumed by the new owner. Non-compete contracts, however, do not automatically vest in favor of the new owner of the business. Section 542.335(f)(2) of the Florida Statutes permits enforcement of non-competition agreements by an assignee or…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA BUSINESS LITIGATION: DEFENSE AGAINST CLAIMS ASSERTING “INTRACORPORATE CONSPIRACY”
Mavrick Law Firm Team

Aggrieved litigants can claim they are victims of a conspiracy – that a group of persons has agreed to perform an unlawful act and damaged them. Such claims can expose multiple parties to liability for the same conduct by allegedly contributing to harm against the plaintiff. A “conspirator” can be found responsible for a harm…

Continue reading ›
FLORIDA NONCOMPETE AGREEMENTS: STIPULATIONS TO IRREPARABLE INJURY IN NON-COMPETE CONTRACTS MAY NOT BE ENFORCEABLE
Mavrick Law Firm Team

It has long been recognized that before injunctive relief can be granted a movant must show irreparable injury. Langford v. Rotech Oxygen & Medical Equipment, Inc., 541 So.2d 1267 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). Many non-compete contracts will contain a provision that stipulates that a violation of the restrictive covenant not to compete would create an…

Continue reading ›
DEFENDING FLORIDA EMPLOYERS: EMPLOYER PREVAILS IN OVERTIME WAGE LAWSUIT BASED ON INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS
Mavrick Law Firm Team

To determine whether a person is an employee or independent contractor for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), courts examine several factors to determine the “economic reality” of the relationship between the alleged employee and employer. Merely putting an independent contractor label on the alleged employee or entering a contract that controls the…

Continue reading ›

Client Testimonials

A few months ago our company was in need of a Labor Law Attorney and we were very lucky to have found Peter Mavrick. He is a great attorney, he maneuvered through a rather complex Employers Liability case advocating against the opposition and protecting our company and personal interests. He was...

C.Y.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended our company in a federal court jury trial. The jury ruled our way in a lawsuit by a person claiming our company owed him overtime wages. Mr. Mavrick “out-lawyered” the opposing lawyer and handled the case like our company was his own family’s business.

Business owner Arthur P.

For years, Mr. Mavrick has provided sound advice to my business and he provided excellent representation in a business lawsuit. He is highly responsive and his legal knowledge, skill, and advice are excellent.

Business owner Preston M.

Peter Mavrick successfully defended my company and me in a non-competition covenant lawsuit that sought an injunction that would have effectively shut down my business. Mr. Mavrick energetically handled the case like it was his own. He got the case dismissed with no liability and saved the business...

Business owner Kevin W.

Contact Us

Fill out the contact form or call us at 954-564-2246 or 305-570-4042 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message